*IS THE BIBLE PRESERVED OR RELIABLE*
Polemicists like @btbsoco concede:
1. The Bible is not preserved word for word.
2. They can extract a true & proper understanding of what the text means even if the words are inaccurate, changed or falsified.
Let's test this theory.
1/3
Polemicists like @btbsoco concede:
1. The Bible is not preserved word for word.
2. They can extract a true & proper understanding of what the text means even if the words are inaccurate, changed or falsified.
Let's test this theory.
1/3
John 1:18 has three variants which affect basic theology with distinct & contradictory meanings found among NT manuscripts & Church Father writings.
Can Bob tell us which one was written by John & how he determined it?
2/3
Can Bob tell us which one was written by John & how he determined it?
2/3
I would then ask Bob to tell us which variant the Christian textual critic (whom he brought on to defend the reliability of the New Testament) thinks is the the accurate & original reading.
He will refuse to answer these two basic questions.
3/3
He will refuse to answer these two basic questions.
3/3
Loading suggestions...