To claim that it is a violation of women's rights to prevent women from pursuing professional careers is more misogynistic than banning girls from schools.
There is an hierarchy of knowledge embedded in this view - it assumes that the knowledge gained by a wife or mother...
There is an hierarchy of knowledge embedded in this view - it assumes that the knowledge gained by a wife or mother...
...is of less value than the knowledge gained in university.
Considering that modern universities are institutions developed by MEN, for MEN, and whose adaptation to include women is an afterthought in their history, suggesting that women being excluded from universities...
Considering that modern universities are institutions developed by MEN, for MEN, and whose adaptation to include women is an afterthought in their history, suggesting that women being excluded from universities...
...is oppressive is actually a way of asserting the total superiority of MALE domain knowledge, and insisting that women pursue it rather than female domain knowledge, which is not even seen as deserving the name "education."
Considering that universities are a uniquely...
Considering that universities are a uniquely...
Western institution, insisting on the extreme importance of women attending these institutions is also a way of implicitly affirming the superiority of Western knowledge.
This shows what a total failure feminism is - it's a thoroughly masculinity supremicist movement based on..
This shows what a total failure feminism is - it's a thoroughly masculinity supremicist movement based on..
...the assumption that injustice between men and women is due to men's total superiority by VIRTUE of their masculinity, so that the injustice can only be addressed by making women more masculine and by bringing men DOWN by making them more feminine.
This means viewing power as a monotone spectrum, where masculinity is strength and femininity is weakness.
This is rooted in the problematic idea that universal human rights *exist*. This is a concept which was, again, first conceived by MEN, for MEN, and then extended...
This is rooted in the problematic idea that universal human rights *exist*. This is a concept which was, again, first conceived by MEN, for MEN, and then extended...
...to women and non-Europeans as an afterthought.
As a result, it tries to IMPOSE men's rights onto women, whether they want them or not, and in the process tramples on and degrades women's natural rights, and the very concept of womanhood itself.
As a result, it tries to IMPOSE men's rights onto women, whether they want them or not, and in the process tramples on and degrades women's natural rights, and the very concept of womanhood itself.
The transgender mania proves that liberals have no concept of womanhood, reducing it from a lived reality to a simple label anyone who cuts off their male genitalia can apply to themselves.
Loading suggestions...