This is a bad idea. Science is not a democracy. The more scientists you poll on a topic the fewer of them will actually understand the topic. Collect arguments, not opinions.
timeshighereducation.com
timeshighereducation.com
Maybe I should add an explanation for why I think so. The issue is that people will draw the wrong conclusions from those numbers, interpreting it as a probability that a *statement* is right or wrong, not factoring in the probability that scientists are sometimes wrong.
If you want to know what's the probability that climate change is man-made you do a data analysis. You don't poll scientists. But if 3% of scientists in a poll say they don't believe it's man-made, the risk is that people think there's a 3% chance this is correct.
In science you always have people who hold onto cherished believes and can't be bothered to think about new data/results/arguments because they contradicts something they once claimed. If you rely on polls you are factoring in all those social and psychological problems.
Loading suggestions...