The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
centerforhealthsecurity.org
centerforhealthsecurity.org
The extraordinary group of participants consisted of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future.
Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.
Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty. Each problem and choice had serious health, economic, and social ramifications.
Sounds alot like C19 plandemic 2.0...
Sounds alot like C19 plandemic 2.0...
Lessons from the exercise
Leaders must prepare now to make difficult, critically important decisions with limited information in the early days of the next pandemic in order to increase the chances that a dangerous outbreak can be contained at the source.
Leaders must prepare now to make difficult, critically important decisions with limited information in the early days of the next pandemic in order to increase the chances that a dangerous outbreak can be contained at the source.
In the early days of a major new contagious disease epidemic, there could be a brief window of opportunity to stop it from becoming a pandemic.
To successfully contain such an outbreak, decisive and bold action would need to be taken in the face of incomplete data, high scientific uncertainty, and potential political resistance.
Thinking through such challenges, preparing in advance to react effectively, and practicing through both high-level tabletop and operational exercises should start now.
It may seem like all these critical policy decisions have been resolved during the COVID-19 pandemic, but they have not.
In the Catastrophic Contagion simulation, even a group of some of the wisest and most experienced international public health leaders who lived through COVID-19...
wrestled with opposing views on whether countries should impose travel restrictions or close schools to try to contain a serious new epidemic that was disproportionately affecting children.
The exercise raised a pivotal question: If future pandemics have a much higher lethality than COVID-19, or for example, if they affect predominantly children, would or should countries take different, stronger, earlier measures to contain it, and what are those measures?
Countries should establish a global network of professional public health leaders who can work together to improve epidemic preparedness and response and strive for consensus on scientific issues in advance of the next major outbreak.
There is no existing worldwide professionalized network of public health preparedness and response leaders who can work together between and during epidemics to better prepare all countries and provide mutual aid and sharing of best practices during serious epidemics.
Establishing an international network of national public health leaders, along the lines of the professionalized “Pandemic Corps” referred to in our exercise, could substantially help countries save lives and livelihoods during major epidemics and recover more quickly.
Political leaders, who are entrusted with keeping their citizens safe, could benefit from consensus views offered by such a group, rather than having to make impromptu, high consequence policy decisions when lives are at stake during dangerous outbreaks.
Countries should prioritize efforts to increase trust in government and public health; improve public health communication efforts; increase the resiliency of populations to misleading information; and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation.
In future pandemics, we should continue to expect even more major disruptions from misinformation and disinformation.
The WHO can be a globally trusted source, and it can share science and public health information widely, but we should not expect it alone to combat or put a stop to the spread of this mis- and disinformation.
Countries need to collaborate to anticipate that threat and prepare to combat it with their own laws and procedures.
Just as many types of economic and societal harms can be anticipated and accounted for in pandemic preparedness plans, so too can predictable false or misleading health messaging.
Concertedly exploring ways to address this phenomenon on a national level in advance of the next pandemic will be crucial to saving lives.
WHO member states should strengthen international systems for sharing and allocating scarce public health resources. Groundbreaking global collaborations, such as the ACT-Accelerator and COVAX, were launched during the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, public health leaders still lack confidence in current approaches to fairly allocate medical countermeasures during a future pandemic.
Even if there were a global commitment around equity for all countries, implementing equitable allocation will continue to be very difficult in the future, especially if there are practical challenges and special requirements like refrigeration or IV administration.
Empowering all regions of the world to save lives during a pandemic would increase equitable access to life-saving treatments and vaccines.
Therefore, we need to build up manufacturing, distribution, and administration capacities around the world, paying particular attention to countries with poor infrastructure. This should happen now, rather than during a growing pandemic.
This should happen now, rather than during a growing pandemic.
It is clear from Catastrophic Contagion that even after the terrible impact of COVID-19, more preparedness work needs to be done, new decisions need to be made, and additional resources committed. We need to expand the limits of our ability to respond.
What you've just read what quoted and directly pulled from centerforhealthsecurity.org.
I do not have Twitter blue, so the following video is in 2 parts. This is part 1 which discusses another pandemic posed by 2025, according to the Catastrophic Contagion meeting. Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome 2025, SEERS.
According to WHO and the Catastrophic Contagion panel, this will disproportionately affecting children and youth. According to study estimates, 20 million people will die of which 15 million will be children.
In 2019 a similar event was hosted by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, John's Hopkins, and the WEF. This event was called Event 201. A simulation for a high-level pandemic exercise. C19 struck the following year.
centerforhealthsecurity.org
centerforhealthsecurity.org
Feel free to share, or create your own threads. Please get this information shared. It is time to think two steps ahead, rather than two steps behind.
This is all part of Agenda 21/2030. I will link a thread for Agenda 21/2030 below, which I will eventually restructure. Stay safe, remain vigilant, and have faith.
Loading suggestions...