بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Earliest Jewish Christianity accepted the Title “Son of God” for Jesus, but however they understood it in a completely different sense. 1/9
Bart Ehrman explains Jesus thought himself to be the “Son of God” in the sense that other people were Sons of God (Metaphorical, Nothing more) 2/9
EP Sanders (Leading Scholar on the Historical Jesus), explains NT usage of “Son of God” in blasphemous sense, is incorrect and do not think should be accepted. 3/9
Geza Vermes (Another leading Scholar), explains the NT usage of “Son of God” for Jesus is Anachronistic. 4/9
We know throughout OT the Title 'Son of God' is a metaphor & used for Prophets and righteous People, but none of em Portrayed it beyond that, neither their followers took it as begotten/divine, that's the reason why Qur'an only spoke against Christians (and a Jewish sect) 5/9
Classical Muslim Scholars accepted and explained, the Title son/children of God used in the Bible isn't necessarily Shirk and how their followers changed the intended meaning Ibn Kathir: 6/9
Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah: 7/9
Al-Ghazali: 8/9
Shihab al-Din al-Qarafi: (I don't agree with the prophecy link with Rasul ﷺ) 9/9