The Davis-Topol 'Nature Reviews' Article is Pseudo-Hypothesis.
It is not a study, but rather a conjecture article being passed off as inference from scientific endeavor. It is wishful thinking, dressed up in the costume of science.
Journals are suckers for such Narrative.
It is not a study, but rather a conjecture article being passed off as inference from scientific endeavor. It is wishful thinking, dressed up in the costume of science.
Journals are suckers for such Narrative.
Of course, don't infer something I've not said. I have held open all 3 hypotheses:
βΌ Long Coivd
βΌ Denial of Treatment
βΌ Vaccine Sequelae
I'm objecting to using the first hypothesis to exonerate Pharma companies and place the population at further risk from such ignorance.
βΌ Long Coivd
βΌ Denial of Treatment
βΌ Vaccine Sequelae
I'm objecting to using the first hypothesis to exonerate Pharma companies and place the population at further risk from such ignorance.
Loading suggestions...