Rattibha

This is incredibly intellectually dishonest, and I will explain why. This will be a🧵
Also noting the absolute gall to be a homosexual with a rainbow flag in his profile running a site called "based politics"...

The study Brad is citing, as @shortmagenfield points out, doesn't classify men abusing boys as homosexual abuse. It makes a distinction between pedophile behavior and homosexual orientation as 'not counting' somehow.

If a male pedophile abuses a young girl, it is still heterosexual pedophilia.
If a male pedophile abuses a young boy, it is homosexual pedophilia. This study Brad talks about denies this, acting as if pedophilia is its own orientation that is distinct from the sex of involved

Pedophiles do not prey equally on girls or boys. These distinctions matter very much. A man diddling a young boy is homosexual behavior. Full stop. People like Brad don't like the implications of this when statistics of abuse come into play.

This is because it shows the truth of the matter, that there is a link between homosexual orientation and pedophilia. There is an obvious age-related distinction to a large share of homosexual activity. medium.com

medium.com

It's why so many gay men admit their first encounter was at like 13 with an adult male and they act like this isn't pedophilia and it is. There is a reason the Romans called gays "Boy lovers" colloquially. Most girls don't lose their virginity to a man 10 years their senior.

This is because homosexuality is dysfunctional behavior. It's also why gays and lesbians often seek to replicate the male-female dynamic in terms of age and personality. They crudely pantomime the masculine-feminine dynamic. For two men the easiest way to do this is age.

I highly doubt two peers at 14 years old are deciding to fuck each other in the ass. What no one wants to study is the average age disparity between early partners. We need some statistics expert on par with @Steve_Sailer but for gays tbh.

bbc.com Milo even said the quiet part out loud, it's why he was fired from Breitbart.

www.bbc.com

Milo essentially endorsed the viewpoint that any male past puberty is fair game for a man of any age from the homosexual perspective. That it is only pedophilia if the victim is prepubescent. Coincidentally he had gay sex for the first time at 13 and like many, rationalizes it.

This age based distinction of the younger boys serving the "feminine" role in gay relationships due to their youth making them look and act distinctly different from an older male is almost inseparable from the sexuality itself. Gay men are not known for long term partnerships.

You see this dynamic repeat itself in subcultures of homosexuality. "Bears" and "cubs", or the recent scandal where an Army Colonel who retired was engaged in the "Pup play" kink with an active duty Captain. Check average ages by rank here.

And this *extremely prominent* dynamic in homosexual culture is the norm, not the exception. It's also one of the highest priority things for homosexual "conservative" apologists to handwave or sweep under the "Cardigan Curtain", of non-threatening men of similar age (propaganda)

Not much else to say except that this is why I don't compromise on this issue or its normalization. Zoomers have probably been gaslit to accept this as a fact of reality, but the first time I voted was for Prop 8 in California to repeal gay marriage. *and we won, in CA, in 2008*

So things have not "always been this way" by any stretch. When I enlisted, Don't Ask Don't Tell was still active policy. It was repealed in 2011. Barely 10 years ago.
These attitudes are a recent invention, but pride flags belong in classrooms right?

This is why I do not accept the proposition of "Well any port in a storm, right? We need allies to fight the trannies so why not the gays?" Well how meaningful is the separation between drag and troonery? They're both men grotesquely pantomiming women.

And why is it that if you speak out against grotesque things like drag, you are accused of homophobia? Why is dressing up like a woman seen as some integral expression of homosexuality?
Wake the fuck up people.

townhall.com Now view this outstanding but grisly reporting by @MiaCathell in this context.

townhall.com

It has also come to my attention that Brad Polumbo of "based politics" was caught liking pages full of young boys on Instagram a few years ago:

youtube.com
There ya go.

What's funny is I have a lot of very high level conservatives that follow me, and I know if they see this they would never share it because speaking this simple truth is a professional hazard.
Imagine if Jesse Watters with his 2.2m who follows me RT'd it

But witch testing these issues is important. Because it's what tells you who puts their professional opportunities over their convictions.
There isn't a good reason why it isn't safe to say this if you work in Conservative media, but then you look at Denny Hastert etc...

Also yeah, Mia Cathells reporting isn't some isolated incident. There is a huge number of stories like this to historically reference.

abc.net.au