Shashank Mattoo
Shashank Mattoo

@MattooShashank

25 Tweets 18 reads Jan 25, 2023
Bilahari Kausikan is one of the world's most respected diplomats
-Singapore's fmr Foreign Secy & Amb. to UN
-Author of 3 books
At @MEAIndia's Vajpayee Memorial Lecture, Kausikan spoke abt why ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ will succeed in new world order
๐Ÿงตon 10 insights he has for the world (1/24) ๐Ÿ‘‡
2/24
Insight #1: Don't Panic. We've seen this movie before
The war in ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ & ๐Ÿ“ˆtension b/w ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ&๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ have spooked the world after relative peace in the world since the 1990s
Kausikan advises folks not to panic because this is a return to normalcy. Competition b/w states is natural
3/24
History shows that competition b/w pwrs is the rule & long periods of peace exception
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's pwr & ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ relative weakness led to 30yr peace. Now that balance of pwr is restored, competition is back
We have managed tensions b4 (eg: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in Cold War)
Bottom Line: Don't Panic
4/24
Kausikan: "Looking around the world today, I conclude that we have seen this movie before. The cast of characters and locations may have changed. But whether we look at the war in๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ or ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ strategic rivalry, these are not new plots. They are new variants of old plots"
5/24
Insight #2: This is not a new Cold War
Kausikan dismissed talk of a new Cold War
During Cold War, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ & USSR led two separate ideological & econ. systems connected very minimally
Goal of each system was to replace the other
Choices facing ctries. like ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ were binary
6/24
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ competition is nothing like Cold War
Why? Because both pwrs are interdependent
Unlike Cold War, which was a clash of two different systems, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ rivalry is competition within one system
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ not interested in replacing ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ system since it has benefited so much from it
7/24
Kausikan also says West needs๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
"Whatever their concerns about ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ behaviour, even the closest ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ally is not going to cut itself off from ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ"
But ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ also needs West
"China has no alternative to the global West for critical enabling technologies"
8/24
Insight #3: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ not an existential threat
Unlike USSR,๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ wants to keep ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ order as its economy is dependent on it
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ may want to take ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's place at centre but can't do it w/o risking undermining global order
While ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is a competitor, its rise isn't an existential crisis
9/24
Insight #4: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ "no limits" partnership is very limited
Both ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ&๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ are unhappy w. their alliance
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ war in UKR puts๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ in awkward position w. Europe while๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has major domestic troubles
But ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ cannot break up w. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ b'cuz it has no other major partner that also dislikes ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
10/24
At the same time, ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ not happy with ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's tepid support over ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ war
Kausikan: "But ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ too, has no other partner other than ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ of any strategic weight, anywhere prepared to stand on its side against the West"
So the threat posed by ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ to the world is not existential
11/24
Insight #5: Keep an eye on ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
No need to be naรฏve though: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ still a threat
Xi Jinping & CCP rely on narrative of historic humiliation to justify their power
This narrative "instills ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ policy with a strong sense of entitlement" & leads to uncompromising behaviour
12/24
Kausikan: "After all, if I am only trying to reclaim what was taken from me when I was weak..why should I not compromise? Why should I not strongly assert myself to regain my view?"
CCP is unwilling to stop this narrative & compromise
This makes ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ a threat to watch
13/24
Insight #6: What new global order will look like
While ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ competition not existential, it will remake world order
New world order will have๐Ÿ“ˆcompetition & tension b/w West &๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
But, there will be major econ dependency & political collaboration on problems like climate
14/24
Best example of this new world: semiconductors
They represent a ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ tech weakness
While West controls supply chain,๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is 40% of the global market
Kausikan: You cannot..cut off your companies and those of your allies.. from 40% of the market w/o doing them serious damage"
15/24
Insight #7: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ will become more transactional
As competition w.๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ will also change
After long wars in Middle East,๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ redefining its role
Bottom Line: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ will be more transactional w. allies
It will do a lot for pwrs willing to aid ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ interests & little for neutrals
16/24
Kausikan: "Trump made..crudely transactional demands..Biden is consultative, but he does not consult partners..for the pleasure of their company. He is consulting us to ascertain what we are prepared to do for ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ"
Those partners that meet expectations like AUS get AUKUS
17/24
Kausikan: "If you do not meet expectations, Mr. Biden will probably still be polite, but you should not expect to be taken too seriously. And the shift to a more transactional whether polite or otherwise American foreign policy is, I think, permanent"
18/24
Insight #8: What the new order means for ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
1. Can't avoid engaging w. both ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ&๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ
"Without ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, there can be no balance to ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ anywhere. And w/o engagement w.๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ may well take us for granted"
This engagement w. aggressive ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ & transactional ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ has a catch
19/24
2. Concern over ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ behaviour will lead to looser alliances
Kausikan:"I know of no country that is without concerns about some aspect or another, of both ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ &๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ behavior.. and they exist even in the closest of American allies, and in States deeply dependent on China"
20/24
Kausikan: "Dealing with major pwrs with whom we cannot avoid working but do not entirely trust requires strategic autonomy.. Few countries will commit to aligning themselves across the entire range of issues with any single major power"
This will impact even ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ alliances
21/24
Implications for ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
Kausikan: Search for autonomy "does not mean that alliances or less formal arrangements, like the Quad will break up, but they will become looser over time, as countries who want to preserve the widest possible range of options for themselves"
22/24
Insight #9: Why ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ is uniquely positioned to succeed
Successful ctries. in new order will have to pursue autonomy & will need to be comfortable w. constant shifts in int'l politics & shifting transactional alliances
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's foreign policy is well suited to this new order
23/24
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's foreign policy values
-Strategic autonomy
-Issue-based alliances (defence ties w. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, energy ties w. Iran, econ. & pol w. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ)
-Good ties w. various geopolitical blocs
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ has a mindset that is comfortable w. ambiguity & autonomy
This sets ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ apart in new order
24/24
Insight #10: What ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ must do
Ctries. will have one goal in new order: "achieving a position that will enable you to benefit from interdependence while๐Ÿ“‰ your own vulnerabilities and exploiting your rivalsโ€™ vulnerabilities"
Interdependence is a tool to use & guard against
Kudos to @DrSJaishankar, MEA & the Policy Planning team for organising this
For the full lecture: youtu.be

Loading suggestions...