BJP Thread
Every BJP Activist/Influencer/Journalist to their political rivals:
Stud Hero Alom will come on his Bike, seduce and 'Love Jihad' all H Girls:
BJP Feminists
BJP Fanboys and Gora Validation
BJP Dhandho Elite
PM himself has repeated this
BJP Elite
BJP Elite Distraction Tactic
BJP Influencer Life
Shri Amit Malviya ji, Jai Ho
We must increase the Woman LFPR so more of them can experience true empowerment.
BJP Original Sin Doctrine
Dhandho-Dominant OBC Alliance:
The Hindu-Majority this Walrus Boomer Kangs on 24/7 was constructed bit by bit by the same 'Pundits' he's demonising. The unity undergirding our diversity comes from them integrating communities into the Hindusphere.They're still doing that thankless job.
"Masculinity is a Colonial Construct"
BJP.
BJP.
Zakir Naik says almost exactly this.
Elementary.
1. Vote for Anti-Hindu SP, RJD, BSP, Bhim Army, DMK, JDU, JDS, NCP, Sambhaji Brigade, AIMIM is not GC.
2. We have Data for ~60 years. Brahmins & GCs least likely to vote for Centre-Left & Left. For that loyalty, they only get hatred in return from BJP.
2. We have Data for ~60 years. Brahmins & GCs least likely to vote for Centre-Left & Left. For that loyalty, they only get hatred in return from BJP.
Show me any influential BJP Politician who would dare to be remotely critical of him.
Tharoor, a card-carrying Liberal btw, has the Testicular Fortitude to criticise Saheb(from a Liberal perspective). Where is the Hindu Nationalist critique of Saheb?
openthemagazine.com
Tharoor, a card-carrying Liberal btw, has the Testicular Fortitude to criticise Saheb(from a Liberal perspective). Where is the Hindu Nationalist critique of Saheb?
openthemagazine.com
1/2 Saama Veda is sung. In metre. That isn't possible in other languages.
The Vedas proper are not some 'book' to be read. That Bhagwat doesn't know this is indicative of deep deracination.
indianexpress.com
The Vedas proper are not some 'book' to be read. That Bhagwat doesn't know this is indicative of deep deracination.
indianexpress.com
2/2 Last, this will end up being Zakir Naik 2.0. 'Vedas were revealed, then corrupted/interpolated'. Bhagwat has said this. Corrupted by? Bhagwat has answered that question too. Evil Brahmin 'Pundits'.
indianexpress.com
indianexpress.com
Must-Read.
thehindu.com
thehindu.com
1/2 Unfortunately, Hindu Political, Social, Economic and Cultural Leaders are Women and Managerial-Mercantile Effeminate Men. Neither are capable of leadership.
2/2 Theseπ2 groups lead with fear & victimhood. This is both false & counterproductive.
Imagine a General telling his soldiers:
'1000 Saal ki Ghulami'
'Our Women can't resist their Men'
'We are recording our demise'
'If by chance we win, we'll expose their Hypocrisy'.
Imagine a General telling his soldiers:
'1000 Saal ki Ghulami'
'Our Women can't resist their Men'
'We are recording our demise'
'If by chance we win, we'll expose their Hypocrisy'.
1/2 Imposition of
Dhandho (Neoliberal)Economics +
Dhandho (Veg)Culture.
Responsibility & Accountability to combat Climate Change being transferred from Big Govt & Big Corps to the Individual. Plus pressure to abandon 'harmful to climate' Meat-Eating.
m.timesofindia.com
Dhandho (Neoliberal)Economics +
Dhandho (Veg)Culture.
Responsibility & Accountability to combat Climate Change being transferred from Big Govt & Big Corps to the Individual. Plus pressure to abandon 'harmful to climate' Meat-Eating.
m.timesofindia.com
2/2 Expect already skyrocketing prices of Meat, in particular Mutton, to soar higher. Plus, massive propaganda push by Govt and Corps against Meat-Consumption.
Literally saying 'Dhandhe se bada koi Dharm nahi' in other words.
India the Republic has already failed. Will fail further. SUPAPOWWA 2020 didn't materialise. SUPAPOWWA 2050 won't either. People are waking up. The Hindutva State needs scapegoats. They have picked Brahmins and Kshatriyas as those scapegoats. That's all there is to it.
The whole premise is flawed. Their narrative is that We are Backward because
"We were Slaves"
"For 1000 Years"
"Unity could have prevented that"
"Unity was prevented by evil Brahmanas and Kshatriyas"
"Give Wealth/Land/Seat/Job/Ancestry/Women for Unity, else we'll Convert"
This used to be a fringe narrative. It is now mainstream. It is the Child's version of History and totally False.
99.99% Hindus were not subjected to Slavery.
Turkic + Native muslim rule was ~600 years. Brit, ~130 years. Empire was the norm, everyone did it. All regions have lost to Foreign Imperialists. Nothing unique. All regions have had natives who collaborated with foreign imperialists. Again, not unique. Hindus did often put up a United Front. Hindu Shahis for instance, when they lost 1000 or so years ago leading to the establishment of Turkic rule in the Indian Subcontinental 'Mainland', did precisely that. They still lost.
Any semblance of Unity in this Civilisation is predominantly down to the Brahman Varna who existed primarily to unite various ethnicities under a common High-Culture and the still continuing Sanskritisation Project.
Varna was not the imposition of profession. Neither was it a Power Hierarchy. No sane Academic says so. Else why would you have 99% of Brahmins past and present not being Priests and any number of Kings and Moneylenders for Millennia being (ritually)'Shudra'?
India is backward because of the same things that determine success and failure everywhere, long-term:
Genes, Culture, Geography and Politics. Each, explained best in the context of relative outcomes, by Charles Murray, Theodore Dalrymple, Jared Diamond and Niall Ferguson respectively.
The whole premise is flawed. Their narrative is that We are Backward because
"We were Slaves"
"For 1000 Years"
"Unity could have prevented that"
"Unity was prevented by evil Brahmanas and Kshatriyas"
"Give Wealth/Land/Seat/Job/Ancestry/Women for Unity, else we'll Convert"
This used to be a fringe narrative. It is now mainstream. It is the Child's version of History and totally False.
99.99% Hindus were not subjected to Slavery.
Turkic + Native muslim rule was ~600 years. Brit, ~130 years. Empire was the norm, everyone did it. All regions have lost to Foreign Imperialists. Nothing unique. All regions have had natives who collaborated with foreign imperialists. Again, not unique. Hindus did often put up a United Front. Hindu Shahis for instance, when they lost 1000 or so years ago leading to the establishment of Turkic rule in the Indian Subcontinental 'Mainland', did precisely that. They still lost.
Any semblance of Unity in this Civilisation is predominantly down to the Brahman Varna who existed primarily to unite various ethnicities under a common High-Culture and the still continuing Sanskritisation Project.
Varna was not the imposition of profession. Neither was it a Power Hierarchy. No sane Academic says so. Else why would you have 99% of Brahmins past and present not being Priests and any number of Kings and Moneylenders for Millennia being (ritually)'Shudra'?
India is backward because of the same things that determine success and failure everywhere, long-term:
Genes, Culture, Geography and Politics. Each, explained best in the context of relative outcomes, by Charles Murray, Theodore Dalrymple, Jared Diamond and Niall Ferguson respectively.
I Worship God, not Politicians.
As per many prominent BJPoids like Yogi Adityanath and Rajnath Singh, Brahmins Vyasa and Valmiki were SCs. Hanuman too was SC. And famous Kshatriya Kings were 'Bahujan' OBC.
indiatoday.in
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
After Wealth/Land/Seat/Job Redistribution for chimerical HiNdOo UnItY, this is now Ancestor/Ancestry Redistribution via something akin to We Wuzzz KANGzzz Afrocentrist History like seen in this video here. What should we name it? Subaltcentrist, Bahujancentrist. Or Subocentrist, Bahocentrist.
I am here referring to ancestry because that is what the Indian State refers to in the case of Vyasa/Valmiki, and that(ancestry) is also how I am categorised by the State.
For instance, my Father can't say he drinks and so he is no longer Br0m, and demand SC certificate. I can't say I'm a Vaishnav Br0m who eats (a little bit of)Meat and claim 'Bahujan' Status.
We are now at a stage when pointing out the obvious facts that Vyasa and Valmiki were Brahmins or that Prithviraj Chauhan was Kshatriya, would lead to arson, looting and rioting especially if anyone of repute said it in the Hindi Heartland, the HQ of Indian Politics.
While Afrocentrism is laughed at by even some Liberals and Progressives in the West like Louis here, Indian RWers are loudly and proudly behind this cringe.
This even harms the KANGer communities because it disincentivises proper introspection about their past and present backwardness and the required cultural changes for progress.
@ajeetbharti @UnSubtleDesi
indiatoday.in
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
After Wealth/Land/Seat/Job Redistribution for chimerical HiNdOo UnItY, this is now Ancestor/Ancestry Redistribution via something akin to We Wuzzz KANGzzz Afrocentrist History like seen in this video here. What should we name it? Subaltcentrist, Bahujancentrist. Or Subocentrist, Bahocentrist.
I am here referring to ancestry because that is what the Indian State refers to in the case of Vyasa/Valmiki, and that(ancestry) is also how I am categorised by the State.
For instance, my Father can't say he drinks and so he is no longer Br0m, and demand SC certificate. I can't say I'm a Vaishnav Br0m who eats (a little bit of)Meat and claim 'Bahujan' Status.
We are now at a stage when pointing out the obvious facts that Vyasa and Valmiki were Brahmins or that Prithviraj Chauhan was Kshatriya, would lead to arson, looting and rioting especially if anyone of repute said it in the Hindi Heartland, the HQ of Indian Politics.
While Afrocentrism is laughed at by even some Liberals and Progressives in the West like Louis here, Indian RWers are loudly and proudly behind this cringe.
This even harms the KANGer communities because it disincentivises proper introspection about their past and present backwardness and the required cultural changes for progress.
@ajeetbharti @UnSubtleDesi
This also illustrates the primary issue with Hindutva:
It is not Religious.
Hindutva criticism of that community is always restricted to Liberalism. In other words, they say that Ms are insufficiently Liberal. They don't know or care about Theology which is why there is no pushback to that community on Theology.
Responses are one of the following:
Sirf Upasana paddhati alag hai, DNA aur Kulchur ek hai.
Ekam Sat...
Halala/Triple Talaq/Love Jihad/Hijab-Burka.
The most influential Hindus are Hindutvavadi. And they are bungling a golden opportunity. Power is always temporary.
I am not saying anything controversial. I'm saying to (influential)Hindus what then PM of the UK David Cameron said when he encouraged Christians to 'be more Evangelical'. Muslims already do this and Hindus need to Compete.
@ajeetbharti
@UnSubtleDesi
@Sanjay_Dixit Uncle
It is not Religious.
Hindutva criticism of that community is always restricted to Liberalism. In other words, they say that Ms are insufficiently Liberal. They don't know or care about Theology which is why there is no pushback to that community on Theology.
Responses are one of the following:
Sirf Upasana paddhati alag hai, DNA aur Kulchur ek hai.
Ekam Sat...
Halala/Triple Talaq/Love Jihad/Hijab-Burka.
The most influential Hindus are Hindutvavadi. And they are bungling a golden opportunity. Power is always temporary.
I am not saying anything controversial. I'm saying to (influential)Hindus what then PM of the UK David Cameron said when he encouraged Christians to 'be more Evangelical'. Muslims already do this and Hindus need to Compete.
@ajeetbharti
@UnSubtleDesi
@Sanjay_Dixit Uncle
Loading suggestions...