Politics
Conspiracy Theories
International Relations
Health
Political Commentary
Thesis Challenges
Accusations against the US
1) Now that you all have a general understanding of my thesis.
Let’s address any challenges or counter arguments to what I have presented.
You’re welcome to add any in the comments. Any legitimate challenges worthy of merit, I will try to address.
Let’s address any challenges or counter arguments to what I have presented.
You’re welcome to add any in the comments. Any legitimate challenges worthy of merit, I will try to address.
2) So let’s isolate what we know for certain.
We know that Russia and China have been, and continue to, formally accuse the US of developing bioweapons.
Whether the accusations are accurate is in question, but the accusations themselves, are real.
google.com
We know that Russia and China have been, and continue to, formally accuse the US of developing bioweapons.
Whether the accusations are accurate is in question, but the accusations themselves, are real.
google.com
3) Russian MIL specifically accused “Western Elites” and the “Democrat National Party” for facilitating a plan with “Big Pharma”.
We know that Obama, Biden, Clinton, and Soros have assets/connections to Pharma and Ukraine. That’s not theory.
Their accusations seem plausible.
We know that Obama, Biden, Clinton, and Soros have assets/connections to Pharma and Ukraine. That’s not theory.
Their accusations seem plausible.
4) The accusations alone are convincing, but the MSM’s response and lack of honest reporting on these allegations would indicate that fire accompanies this smoke.
The MSM have been pounding the table that allegations are “debunked conspiracy theory”.
cbsnews.com
The MSM have been pounding the table that allegations are “debunked conspiracy theory”.
cbsnews.com
5) When the MSM label something as “conspiracy theory”, it usually ends up being true.
When “fact-checkers” label something as “disinformation”, it usually ends up being true.
Hunter’s Laptop comes to mind.
Apply Transitive Property.
@nateburleson stick to football my guy
When “fact-checkers” label something as “disinformation”, it usually ends up being true.
Hunter’s Laptop comes to mind.
Apply Transitive Property.
@nateburleson stick to football my guy
6) @CBSMornings downplays the activity at these labs. The labs the MSM vehemently said didn’t exist…
Now the labs exist, but they are “harmless”. The most dangerous pathogens on Earth are sitting in a sweet little Ukrainian lady’s freezer, in a warzone…
NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT
Now the labs exist, but they are “harmless”. The most dangerous pathogens on Earth are sitting in a sweet little Ukrainian lady’s freezer, in a warzone…
NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT
7) So for those who want to say this is “Russian disinformation”, or immediately disregard what Russia says; that’s an illogical and primitive way to think.
The US government and media produces more disinformation than anyone else on Earth.
Are we supposed to trust them?
The US government and media produces more disinformation than anyone else on Earth.
Are we supposed to trust them?
8) I’m not saying Russia has all the answers, but what they are saying is making more sense than what our gov/media is pushing.
Its not my fault our gov/media have proven to be dishonest. If they want us to trust them, why did they lie to us about everything related to C19?
Its not my fault our gov/media have proven to be dishonest. If they want us to trust them, why did they lie to us about everything related to C19?
9) The fact that these formal allegations from Russia/China to the UN exist, and have been ongoing for years, and the Western public doesn’t really know about it…that’s a story in of itself.
World superpowers accusing each other of biological warfare seems like a big story, no?
World superpowers accusing each other of biological warfare seems like a big story, no?
10) Notice how everyone on Earth wants to know who created C19, EXCEPT for the US government and MSM?
Notice how the entire world now accepts C19 came from a lab, but the US government hasn’t admitted it, and the NIH is still riding with the “natural event” narrative?
Notice how the entire world now accepts C19 came from a lab, but the US government hasn’t admitted it, and the NIH is still riding with the “natural event” narrative?
10) So when we juxtapose which side has been more honest, forthcoming, and transparent; it’s Russia.
They want accountability. Russia want investigations into US biological activity because it resulted in a global pandemic that killed millions.
The US just cry “disinformation”.
They want accountability. Russia want investigations into US biological activity because it resulted in a global pandemic that killed millions.
The US just cry “disinformation”.
11) The US and the West have shown their agenda revolves around covering up the origins of Covid.
Russia and the East have shown their agenda revolves around uncovering the origins of Covid.
One side wants transparency and one side went full-Orwell.
Your choice.
/END
Russia and the East have shown their agenda revolves around uncovering the origins of Covid.
One side wants transparency and one side went full-Orwell.
Your choice.
/END
Loading suggestions...