Politics Military International Relations Military Affairs
Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺
Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

@ejmalrai

13 Tweets 7 reads Feb 04, 2023
Twitter
Before delivering F-16s (Ukrainian pilots already training) and tanks to #Ukraine, #US-led NATO assures air protection first to try and push #Russia to use non-conventional weapons.
France, Italy ready to deliver SAMP/T anti-missile system to Ukraine reuters.com
www.reuters.com
The #US confiscated $5.4 million belonging to sanctioned #Russian businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, paving the way for the Russian funds to potentially be used to help rebuild war-ravaged #Ukraine and turn Russian against President Vladimir Putin.
The 5.4 million pave the way to rob hundreds of billions belonging to #Russia and #Russians and to force #Moscow to do the same so mainstream media can dem,onise the Russia government further.
It is a complete military and finasncial war.
The objective of @vonderleyen's visit to #Kyiv is to give hope to #Ukraine that it will join the #EU as a reward for offering 100s of thousands of Ukrainians to be sacrificed in this US proxy war and avoid seeing Zelensky weakening by the significant number of Ukrainians killed.
#US is playing an obvious game: #Ukraine demands (as suggested by the US) more weapons & a particular type of tanks and Fighter jets. The US answer negatively. The EU "doesn't exclude". Then Europeans race to promise to send these weapons if the US contribute. Then the US agree.
Then mainstream media started leaking information that "perhaps a very small number of tanks and Jets would be delivered". In the meantime, #Ukrainian army members are trained months before any announcement on the weapons already agreed to deliver.
Then the Europeans say: "We may deliver long-range missiles, not jets". Mainstream media allow information about the Jets and tanks to float around. Then tanks are delivered but not jets.
More voices are heard about the necessity to deliver long-range missiles and jets.
The idea of #Ukraine having tanks is widely forgotten coz the mission has been accomplished.
Now the info is that the west is moving to deliver long-range missiles & jets. Which one angers #Russia the most? The jets probably r more sensitive. Let's concentrate on the missiles 1st
Meanwhile, the #Ukraine pilots are trained on the type of missiles and the jets they will receive.
All that to make sure #Russia is swallowing the #US-led NATO delivering all these weapons gradually until one day President Putin decides to stop - but the US won't - or react.
This is the biggest question: How will #Russia react?
No answer to the question unless we see how the Russian army is behaving in the next 2-3 months and how slow-fast the advance will be.
The #US-led NATO will deliver all weapons the battlefield needs without exception.
Neither #Russia can afford to lose nor the #US-led NATO. If Russia loses, it will lose everything & isolated.
If the US-NATO loses, it will show it is weaker than the Russian army, although the US can always say: we did not send out our men, #Ukraine is fighting alone.
The winner has many fathers. The loser has none. Therefore, there will be one (kind off) winner coz in war there r no winners. Nobody expects this war to end soon w/o serious damage to both sides with the exception of the US: #Ukraine offers men & the EU to pay the consequences.
The #US hegemony is challenged long ago. the de-dollarisation is long but starting. The world won't be the same as before the 24th of Feb 2023.
But the US lives on wars and is preparing for years to come a new front against #China.

Categories

Politics Military International Relations Military Affairs

Some tweets missing

Loading suggestions...