...Jay is different because he was recently hired as a director at @mpac_national.
MPAC is a "Muslim" org with a long history working for the US gov to police, surveil, and entrap Muslims.
MPAC has worked closely with the FBI and DHS to implement CVE policies against Muslims.
MPAC is a "Muslim" org with a long history working for the US gov to police, surveil, and entrap Muslims.
MPAC has worked closely with the FBI and DHS to implement CVE policies against Muslims.
CVE was developed in Europe and the US but was exported internationally via UN Security Council Resolution 2178 which "requires governments to take action to counter violent extremism (CVE)."
Many human rights groups observe that CVE has been used to persecute Muslims post 9/11.
Many human rights groups observe that CVE has been used to persecute Muslims post 9/11.
You can read more about CVE and how it is weaponized to attack and cripple the Muslim community in the US, UK, EU and the world:
CAGE: cage.ngo
Intercept: archive.ph
ACLU: aclu.org
CAGE: cage.ngo
Intercept: archive.ph
ACLU: aclu.org
Now, I'm getting back to Jay.
Many Muslim orgs have directly worked with the US gov on CVE, hired CVE operatives, or received CVE grants.
MuslimSkeptic has several articles on this regarding orgs like Yaqeen Inst, ISPU, & more:
#Ties%20to%20CVE%20and%20Counter%20Extremism" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">muslimskeptic.com
#Dalia%20Mogahed" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">muslimskeptic.com
Many Muslim orgs have directly worked with the US gov on CVE, hired CVE operatives, or received CVE grants.
MuslimSkeptic has several articles on this regarding orgs like Yaqeen Inst, ISPU, & more:
#Ties%20to%20CVE%20and%20Counter%20Extremism" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">muslimskeptic.com
#Dalia%20Mogahed" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="event.stopPropagation()">muslimskeptic.com
muslimskeptic.com/2020/04/20/yaq…
Reviewing Yaqeen Institute: A Source of Certainty or Doubt? - The Muslim Skeptic
Note: UPDATED August 30, 2021. This is a living document that will in sha’ Allah be updated as Yaqee...
muslimskeptic.com/2020/04/20/yaq…
Reviewing Yaqeen Institute: A Source of Certainty or Doubt? - The Muslim Skeptic
Note: UPDATED August 30, 2021. This is a living document that will in sha’ Allah be updated as Yaqee...
But, the worst offender is MPAC.
MPAC pretends to be a Muslim advocacy org while in reality working with the feds to surveil and entrap Muslims.
Here is a report on just how corrupt and sleazy MPAC is and how deep their lies and deception really go: ehsan.substack.com
MPAC pretends to be a Muslim advocacy org while in reality working with the feds to surveil and entrap Muslims.
Here is a report on just how corrupt and sleazy MPAC is and how deep their lies and deception really go: ehsan.substack.com
MPAC was so thoroughly shamed for their involvement with CVE, they were forced to issue a disingenuous apology (that did nothing to fix all the damage theyve done): archive.ph
The admission of guilt was especially dishonest bc MPAC is back to working with the feds!
The admission of guilt was especially dishonest bc MPAC is back to working with the feds!
.@SalamAlmarayati MPAC's president has been involved with the Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden admins. He was working with the US gov immediately after 9/11, advising the Bush admin on how best to fight "radical Islam."
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
The DHS website says that one of the main objectives is information sharing between feds and faith based orgs. What kind of information (i.e., surveillance) do faith based orgs share with the feds?
archive.ph
archive.ph
Notice how RAND emphasizes that modernists need to be supported in competing with fundamentalist/traditionalist Muslims.
This is why Jay is so eager to debate me and others. His employment at MPAC with its fed-backing enables this kind of work, pushing Islamic reform.
This is why Jay is so eager to debate me and others. His employment at MPAC with its fed-backing enables this kind of work, pushing Islamic reform.
He has accused prominent Muslims figures like @Farid_0v and @DrTalAbdulrazaq of being ISIS supporters or "one step away" from becoming ISIS.
Hashmi claims that he is anti-imperialism and anti-colonialism. Yet his actually statements and behavior as well as his employment with MPAC, a DHS-sponsored federal agency, tell a very different story.
Anyone can claim anything. But actions and affiliations don't lie.
Anyone can claim anything. But actions and affiliations don't lie.
Now, since Hashmi has begged to debate me on modernism, I have accepted. I agree to debate him on how modernism is pushed by native informants who work for liberal governments, as exemplified by MPAC and Hashmi.
Hashmi claims that this topic is not relevant to Islamic modernism.
This shows Hashmi's deep ignorance of the historical and political dimensions of modernism and its weaponization against the Muslim community.
This shows Hashmi's deep ignorance of the historical and political dimensions of modernism and its weaponization against the Muslim community.
Hashmi wants to arbitrarily limit the scope of debate in order to avoid the most problematic aspects of his ideology and his work. He says if I do not accept his convenient limitations, I am "scared."
No, Jay. You are scared. I am happy to debate you on modernism in your work.
No, Jay. You are scared. I am happy to debate you on modernism in your work.
I have even offered Jay a second debate as consolation. If he debates me on native informants and MPAC's work for CVE and the feds, I will happily debate him on other aspects of modernism in a second debate.
Why doesn't Hashmi agree to this?
Why doesn't Hashmi agree to this?
Is it because he does not have permission from his handlers at DHS? Does his fed-funded salary not cover debates that blow his cover and the cover of his boss @SalamAlmarayati?
What kind of "information sharing" are you doing with DHS, Javad? Where is the transparency?
What kind of "information sharing" are you doing with DHS, Javad? Where is the transparency?
No Muslim should engage with this murtad shill until he agrees to be scrutinized by the Muslim community he has been deputized by the US gov to attack.
It is unethical to share a platform with someone who very well may be covertly reporting our community to the government.
It is unethical to share a platform with someone who very well may be covertly reporting our community to the government.
Loading suggestions...