So, I've been thinking about what the future could hold for Starknet, and it got me wondering - what if Starknet went the path of Microsoft?
Let's start with the basics - for those who may not know, Microsoft is one of the biggest tech companies in the world, but it's not open source. So, what does that mean for Starknet?
If Starknet were to follow in Microsoft's footsteps, it could potentially lead to a more centralized, closed-off ecosystem.
Instead of anyone being able to contribute and build on top of the technology, only a select few would have access.
Instead of anyone being able to contribute and build on top of the technology, only a select few would have access.
This could potentially stifle innovation and limit the growth and adoption of Starknet.
It's important to remember that one of the biggest strengths of open-source projects like Linux is the community and diversity of ideas that come with it.
It's important to remember that one of the biggest strengths of open-source projects like Linux is the community and diversity of ideas that come with it.
On the other hand, if Starknet were to become fully open-source, it would align with the decentralized nature of the project and bring more merit to the public Starknet ecosystem.
This would enable anyone to contribute and build on top of the technology, leading to a more diverse and robust ecosystem.
Of course, the open-source approach would not guarantee success, but it does create a level playing field for all participants and allows for a more inclusive and equitable ecosystem.
The future is uncertain, but one thing is for sure - the path Starknet chooses will have a big impact on its success and the success of the entire ecosystem.
Loading suggestions...