Very good thread

@kmadathil - the only other thing I would add/ modify is that I wouldn’t view this as some political compromise. But rather as a divinely inspired insight on multiple sacred paths to the ultimate truth. That may seem like a quibble, but is actually central on the implications…

…for today. That is it shouldn’t be understood as political calculus being the key and the divine used as a cover - that way we will end up with legitimising many random ideas of today on the grounds of political expediency. Sanyal doesn’t do that explicitly, but we should….

…explicitly centre the divine IMO. The basis of our civilisation is the pursuit of multiple traditional paths to the Ultimate Divine Truth.