A Type Certificate (airworthiness) is needed for civilian passenger aircraft to operate in different countries.
The main Type Certificate issuer are US FAA and EU's EASA.
China's CAAC is also important.
The main Type Certificate issuer are US FAA and EU's EASA.
China's CAAC is also important.
So which one is more successful?
China's approach, of course.
China's ARJ21 an equivalent to the Japanese MRJ have already delivered 100+ airframes with 300+ more on order.
The bigger C919 has made its delivery, and currently has 583 on order
China's approach, of course.
China's ARJ21 an equivalent to the Japanese MRJ have already delivered 100+ airframes with 300+ more on order.
The bigger C919 has made its delivery, and currently has 583 on order
Japan's approach may look better on paper
"35% of Boeing 787 is made in Japan"
But without the ecosystem, the Japanese do not know the "Unknown unknowns" of aircraft manufacturing.
With millions of components, the civilian passenger jet is one of the most complex machinery
"35% of Boeing 787 is made in Japan"
But without the ecosystem, the Japanese do not know the "Unknown unknowns" of aircraft manufacturing.
With millions of components, the civilian passenger jet is one of the most complex machinery
As Chinese Comac passenger jets, take market shares from Boeing and Airbus,
China's CAAC's Type Certificate will be much more influential
This will form a triopoly between EU's Airbus, US Boeing and Chinese Comac
The A.B.Cs of civilian aerospace industry
China's CAAC's Type Certificate will be much more influential
This will form a triopoly between EU's Airbus, US Boeing and Chinese Comac
The A.B.Cs of civilian aerospace industry
Loading suggestions...