Rattibha

What's Judaism's view toward world order? One-world government? One-world religion?
We don't have to speculate nor contemplate conspiracy theories ad infinitum.
We definitely don't have to "hate" Jews or criticize them "for no reason" as they allege.
We read their own works:

The book above (1945) starts by affirming that the "sufferings of Israel" recently (it was before The Holocaust™ was mass-marketed) in WWII was the "most appalling crime that the world has ever seen."
Schonfield's text has the same purpose as the United Nations: "Never Again!"

(p. 11) Already in 1945, Jews like Schonfield were already advertising the "Big Lie" style propaganda as if it was Hitler's invention all along- as if in 'Mein Kampf' Hitler's original context wasn't specifically referring to Jewry's "big lies" via America/England.

Next, Schonfield admits that there's "a substratum of truth in this reiterated assertion" that "[WWII] was/is a Jewish war".

It is interesting that post-WWII, the Jewish population had not actually decreased by 2/3 as Schonfield predicts above. In fact, World Almanac & other sources confirm the Jewish population to actually have increased slightly over the war years.

Perhaps what the Nazis allege is not all a lie- the author muses. The future, Schonfield suggests, will have to judge whether it was/is the Nazis out to "conquer the world" or America & England:

Notice how in the text above, we Christians, Europeans, & Americans have the "privilege" of "standing with the Jews".
That's a privilege- you know, right?
"We are all Jews now; Spiritually we are Semites" is the identity foisted upon the gullible goyim.

The "terrible grain of truth" is actually that- yes, "Jews are at the bottom of all this New [World] Order business...":

The problem is Christians have their messiah- Jesus Christ. "Heaven on Earth" is a Jewish plan since Christians expect Heaven in the afterlife & since Jesus has already came. The author assumes Christians want "Heaven on Earth" but fails to give a Christian source on the claim.

"Humanity" says Jewry is way more important than "race". And Schonfield just moves on as if Christian dogma & theology reinforces the disintegration of races in favor of his humanistic Jewish globalism:

In fact, all through Schonfield's book, he is commonly, systematically using the most modern, post-WWII definitions of Christians/Christianity in order to reinforce his tenuous thesis that Jews & Christians are essentially the same.
Methinks Jesus Christ might beg the differ.

Tikun Olam, or "repairing the world" is Judaism's central doctrine. In Christianity nothing needs be "repaired". Jesus Christ has already arrived.
Interesting is the specifically 19th/20th Century Judaism striving for Universalism, which was non-essential in centuries prior.

It's interesting how Judaism attempts to co-opt Universality in the same way it co-opts elsewhere.
Jews came into contact w/ Universality, however, via the Greeks & the Persians- an idea that was always incorporated into early Christianity. But Jews want to own universality now.

Prior to modernity really, Judaism was always looked at as a narrow nationalistic religion ("Next year in Jerusalem!") yet suddenly post-WWII & w/ the successes of Zionism we're supposed to believe that "just like Christianity" Judaism too is universalist par excellence.

Reaching Ch. 2 now. New chapter, new thread ⬇️:
Watch how tactically- when their audience is lay Christians especially- Jews will gladly take credit for Jesus & Christianity even as they admit that they killed Him (& would do it again like Sarah Silverman!) in the same sentence:

Notice how the Jew sincerely feels that it's his personal responsibility as well as that of Jews collectively to "heal the world" more or less. This is their internal compulsion, it seems, that manifests religiously w/ "tikun olam" & secularly in so many other negative forms.

Schonfield, in fact, says a "sense of mission" (p. 25) is the most important characteristic of being a Jew- not ethnicity nor any one theological belief.
I said above that "tikun olam" is like the fundamental Jewish teaching, b/c this "mission" is central even to secular Jews.

(p. 31) Note the urgency w/ which this special "mission" to "heal the world" is envisioned in the text.
Or: why Jews have historically been so drawn toward radical, revolutionary political or social movements:

Why Jews are globalists below (p. 33).
Also it's a self-justification for why/how they know more than we do ourselves supposedly for how to manage our own country/family:

(p. 34) Apparently the ancient Greeks, the Byzantines, Spanish, &/or Germans never "prospered"- according to our author.
Stated explicitly is the direct correlation of the "eradication of anti-Semitism" w/ the Jewish Messianic Age too. Explains why The ADL dominates today.

"Anti-Semitism" is a "causeless enmity" apparently.
I guess Schonfield hadn't yet read Freud & the Frankfurt School's theories, which are mainstream & even dogmatic today.
I still can't get over world peace being conditional upon the elimination of this "causeless enmity", lol.

That's going to conclude most of Ch. 2, but I'll start a new thread toward the top of the main post (w/ picture of the book) on Ch. 3 tomorrow most probably. We're already almost a quarter through this short book. Thanks to everyone reading along w/ me.

Starting Ch. 3 tonight⬇️:
This author is writing this book more for English-speaking Christians. His aim basically is to convince low-info Christians of the mid-20th Century that modern-day Judaism is more or less Christianity's ally, its mentor, & father.

To this aim, Schonfield cleverly uses Christian-infused terminology liberally to allow his audience the space necessary to imagine the best about Jewry.
Invoking "Holy Spirit" for familiarity, he leads the naive to imagine he's affirming THE Holy Spirit of the Christian Trinity.

However, as we know, Jews don't believe in the Trinity.
I'm just picking up on the pattern now, however it's a clever little rhetorical device that Schonfield's used all throughout this text so far so as to ingratiate himself & Judaism to Christians as seamlessly as possible.

Here's a fun juxtaposition: what Jews say to Christians verses what Jews actually do & believe (p. 42):

The subtle implication's that only evil Nazis are doing holocausts- casting babies into the flames of foreign & tribal gods.
The Jew wants his Christian audience assuming Nazis are the real baby-killers while the "pro-life" Jews in contrast stand w/ their Christian brothers.

And of this "true New Order" of our post-WWII planet, let's remember "the Jew is to be the symbol and the mediator of it", Schonfield brags.
I agree Jews are the symbol. I just think that what Jews have created is an abomination basically. But back then it wasn't so obvious.

In case anyone thinks I'm embellishing here, it's apt to see Schonfield explicitly advocating "world government" (p. 45) w/ an affirmation that Jews will be its symbols & its mediators. It was commonly bragged by Jews a century ago & prior. Even the UN was "that old Jewish idea".

Last tweet tonight before Ch. 4 tomorrow.
(p. 46) This "New World Order" is explicitly linked to the Jewish Messiah, who ushers in the "peaceful" NWO.
NWO is a Jewish idea- always has been. B/c Jews were the world's first globalists- the "light unto the nations (or goyim)".

Ch. 4 is mostly uneventful. Its one interesting passage (p. 47) explains how Jews' messianic age won't come until the "nations" (or goyim) have ceased "anti-Semitism" finally.
Now you know why Jews put so much effort into combating this "causeless enmity" as Schonfield calls it.

B/c to combat "anti-Semitism" for the Jew is to hasten the advent of their messianic age- rule by their Jewish messiah.
This is all related to their healing [of] the world (or tikun olam), where Jews believe sincerely that non-Jews will come willingly into their New World Order.

Here's a Jew below detailing his sincere conviction that non-Jews will come completely willingly into their messianic age, which is roughly equivalent to what Schonfield dubs the New World Order w/in this text. Keep in mind 1945 was when this was printed.

3 conditions for the messianic age (p 47): a Jew claimant of the Davidic bloodline, Zionism, & the "nations" (or goyim) ceasing "anti-Semitism"- willingly becoming Noahides. Practicality aside, that's why Zionism had huge messianic implications around the time this text appeared.

Otherwise, Ch. 4 is mostly just of "anti-Semitism" through history. Everyone from Haman to Apion to Czar Alexander to Hitler makes an appearance.
The latter half of the book to come will be more specific as to the global "program" of Jewry & how it's supposedly going to happen.

Are we beginning to see how real life events mirror the stuff these people write about internally in mostly Jew-for-Jew publications?
On Jews / "tikun olam" recently, it's not just some dusty theory that academics & rabbis advocate.

Halfway through the book is a sort of interlude explaining how much Judaism was allegedly admired in the ancient & medieval worlds. We have to remember this book was published pre-internet. People simply lacked the ability to easily fact-check. Which encouraged Jews accordingly.

Although it would take additional threads to debunk, which I'm not intending to do explicitly, I must mention that one of these areas that Jews liked to exaggerate a lot a century ago (& before) was how Greek & Latin wisdom was derived from ancient Judaism allegedly.

So accordingly, we find people like Josephus being quoted (p. 50) on how Plato allegedly got all his ideas from the Torah apparently. This interlude part of Shonfield's text is just filled w/ these kinds of examples which are not really taken seriously today except by some Jews.

I would like to revisit this topic later on in an entirely separate thread, but explaining the errors here would simply take us too far off-topic imo, & so I am moving on to more of the world government/world religion material that matters most in this context.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about (p. 54):

The Greeks would- & did- laugh at the Jews whenever they'd make these types of statements. But the goal back then as well as the goal of Schonfield in 1945 was to imply some more ancient pedigree for Jewry, for Judaism, some more advanced source.

This wasn't an exclusively Jew practice either to be fair. Many groups throughout history embellished their own past or their group's claim to great antiquity. These types of claims, however, don't really survive the scrutiny of modernity w/ academic specialization & technology.

Elsewhere, the Jew is "triumphant" (p. 63):

Believe it or not, before the mass-propagandization of the Holocaust™ in the 1960s, & definitely before Fascism in Europe, there was a lot of tough talk & triumphalism from Jewry in popular culture, novels, history books, etc. This is probably epitomized by the Weimar era most.

It would only really be after the period Schonfield wrote this book that what Jewish historian Salo Baron called the "lachrymose conception of Jewish history" would begin to re-enter the picture as a pattern of perpetual Jewish "persecution" throughout history.

Dante & the Renaissance in general wouldn't happened w/out "Jewish intermediaries" (p. 65):

So like I said, a lot of triumphalism on the part of the Jews here. Partially it's w/ respect to the period in time when Schonfield wrote this text, but partially it's just Jewish chutzpuh too- the feeling that they can get away w/ anything b/c Jews already did get away w/ a lot.

That's going to wrap up the Interlude part for tonight, while next we'll move on to Part Two of the book. The first chapter's titled "Anonymous ben Anonymous", & it looks to get into more modern history like w/ Zionism & Reform Judaism- both messianic manifestations of Judaism.

@c0rnelii Along w/ tikun olam & the mutually reinforcing psychologies it creates between Jews / non-Jews, an atmosphere of permissiveness develops whereby in most peoples' minds Jews can't do any wrong whatsoever. They become deified w/in modernity's secular hierarchy.

Building on the theme of "tikun olam" in even secular Jewry, we find Eric Weinstein's own version of it from the supposed Right end of the political spectrum:

That's why I agree w/ Schonfield in his text when he states that even greater than race or religion this internal sense of "mission" is what defines & preoccupies all of Jewry more than anything else. Both secular & religious Jews are compelled by this urgent sense of mission.

Otherwise besides blood what links the Orthodox rabbi, the progressive politician Jew, the secular so-called "conservative" influencer, & the Antifa inciting urbanite goyim? The commonality to all of these is this urgent sense of mission which has its origin in "tikun olam".

Ch. 5 tonight called "Anonymous Ben Anonymous" seems to imply that although Jews have been content as anons "healing the world" for centuries, now they'd like to be known, awarded, etc for their deeds. Schonfield gets explicit about this in the coming pages.

Implicit in the above text, too, is the admission of Judaism as a "hidden hand" or "power behind scenes" in world affairs (p 71). Yet as much as any ordinary person- Jew or not- scoffs at this "conspiracy theory" today, here we have one of their own spokesmen admitting it openly!

Does "a reputation for secret purposefulness and mysteriously organized activity" (p. 71) accurately describe Jewry of today? Although Schonfield promises us there's no real "Judaic cabal", he also says in the same sentence that Judaism's a "leavening activating force"...

..."working in devious ways through the ages" for "the overthrow of injustice & oppression" (p. 72).
Fine, but whose injustice/oppression? W/ clarification we'd see Jews just want to replace what once looked like oppression on their end w/ what now looks like oppression on ours.

B/c the only way for Jews to feel like they are not "oppressed"- like they aren't being "persecuted" basically- is for Jews to monopolize power themselves. Otherwise there will always be somebody like myself around to call a spade a spade!

Imagine the gull of the goyim! We dared call "malign, sinister, destructive" the powers behind Communism, "social justice", Democracy, "Liberty, Equality, & Fraternity".
Here now the Jew proclaims he was the real "force" behind those things- & a whole bunch of other things too!

Schonfield unironically uses the term "light-bringing" (p. 72) to describe the spreading Communism, Freemasonry, & Democracy.
Remember that in the 1940s this idea of "progress" wasn't mocked like it is today. Even back then Jews still felt they were a "light unto the nations".

Here's the "light-bringing" quote. While Jews haven't always played "a leading part", he also says that Judaism's nevertheless been "the effective cause" (p. 73)- referring back to that long list of movements from the Renaissance to Communism to "progress" in general above.

It's funny b/c I mostly only blame Jews for the bad things throughout recent history. Yet this guy, Schonfield, wants to take credit for most of the same things I blame Jews for along w/ a lot of the good things too as well as things that could be considered neutral.

It's as if without Jewry the world just stops or something. I think this is essentially how he imagines it. Such chutzpuh. What absolute hubris.

England was evil prior to Protestantism apparently. I find this interesting only in the sense of how Jews view the coming of Protestantism especially in England as an aid in their perpetual war against "injustice/oppression".
England "learned Salvation is of the Jews" (p. 75).

Yet fast-forward into today's time & England's still getting buried in brown refugees regardless. Even after England fought this war (WWII) that Schonfield admits "Jews are responsible for" (p. 11), only a Jew could say that it bode so well for England's future.

But that's what "heaven on earth" looks like to Jewry- remember.
"Salvation" apparently looks like a mob of women & foreigners blaming Englishmen for daily London stabbings!

"Jewish mission" again, "People of God", "Messianic Age", "kingdom of priests", etc (p. 76).
Now we get into how although Jews have been in the background in the past, today they are ready to give up their anonymity in service to humanity.

Poor Jews- they get no credit, lol.
1945 is apparently opposite today. Today when a Jew does something bad he is never described as a Jew (Weinstein, Epstein, etc) in the mainstream press. However when something "good" is done by a Jew, his identity is aggressively pushed.

Maybe that's a true difference between then/now. Obv then Jews didn't monopolize mainstream media to the extent they do today. So it makes some sense that there'd be a reversal of the scheme we see ourselves daily. Back then Jews were readily associated w/ Communism for instance.

"Sponsor" isn't the best term. Co-opt/infiltrate/subvert is more accurate. Jews like to have their fingers in all pies b/c each piece represents power potentially.
As today, they knock down their own strawmen when they pretend not to understand legitimate arguments against Jews.

Well good thing Schonfield's puts it all into words now at least, lol.
I like the analogy of the Jew who's assumed so many identities today he forgets his own name. It's applicable to Euros too, I think, in that insofar as we imitate Jewry we begin to lose our own identity too.

Since secularity is how Jewry interfaces w/ our own culture, to the extent that Euros or Americans embrace an atomized secular globalist identity as the Jews do, the more we ourselves are Judaized presumably.

Since "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" has finally succeeded in modernity, Jewry no longer has to remain so anonymous.
Figuratively they are breaking down their former ghetto walls. Of course, at the same time Jews will try to break down borders & perimeters of our society too.

Jews never tire of telling the world about their "invention" of Monotheism lol- another tangent to delve into later.
But Judaism says the "world will ultimately adopt" Judaism's teachings the same way many Evangelical Americans or so-called "Christian" Zionists do today (p. 79).

The "link" between Zionism & Reform (or Liberal) Judaism, which in many ways is the link btwn Zionism & Communism too.
Quoting Feuchtwanger (p. 81) saying that Jerusalem will be the center of the world governed by the League of Nations- that "old Jewish idea" once again.

Judaism's goal is "bringing the religions closer together"- imagine that.
I wonder how much then Judaism itself bends towards these other Biblical religions? My guess is that all the bending is done by Christianity toward Judaism. But nowhere is this ever stated explicitly.

And I think it's one of those things that'll never be stated explicitly at all- at least towards Christians. The ambiguity that exists if we read between the lines here, however, effectively guarantees Christianity's being subsumed into Judaism. If Jews have their way- at least.

Here's Herzl saying essentially that "anti-Semitism" can only be solved by the "world in council". It's a "national question" to him that can only be solved through Globalism lol.
I'll give everything 3 guesses too who's at the head of this world council.

Here's an example of "nationalism for me but not for thee" while simultaneously Schonfield admits the Zionists haven't been good to either the world in general nor to the natives. But of course we are assured this will "disappear in time" along w/ our own nations presumably.

It's funny how Schonfield just abruptly ends a chapter on this note. Yeah Zionism's been bad & bloody & Jews are misbehaving generally, but that will all disappear in time allegedly. When?
Meanwhile nations are "a hindrance" (p. 84) to the NWO in every other country's case.

This brings us to the end of Ch. 5, but there's 3 more chapters to go, which I'll hopefully follow-up on tomorrow. Thanks everyone for following along. Honestly I'll be happy, however, once this book is finally finished.

Here's a rabbi stating that Christians will be made to worship Jewry the way they worship Jesus now:

Ch. 6⬇️is actually called "Negative Aspects":

Which is kind of funny b/c remember the entire impetus & thrust of the Jewish messianic age, or NWO, is humanity is now perfect, everything is peaceful perpetually, & that the "brotherhood of man" co-exists, etc.
But now we find in the fine print that there's "negative aspects"?

In 1945 it was popularly assumed to be only 2 million Jews killed. The famous "6 million" had not been mass-manufactured yet.
B/c Schonfield mentions the 2/3 in the very next sentence, that 2 million is 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 2/3 of their kabbalistic 6 million.

Of course, we know Jews had been aggressively injecting the "6 million" into major newspapers & publications going all the way back to the 19th Century.
What's interesting here is that "6 million" wasn't official WWII dogma 𝘺𝘦𝘵- even in some Jewish circles, like Schonfield's.

6 million was already astroturfed by Jewry, but our author Schonfield seems not aware of it or not interesting in taking advantage of it.
Schonfield uses 2 million w/ the subconscious slip of 2/3 in the next sentence for his predicted total.
Bringing us once again to 6 million.

So what are some of these "negative aspects" to the Jewish messianic world order as stated by Schonfield?
Well, right off the bat, he says, there'll be "a good few thousand less Jews in the world", lol.

Presumably that statement's made in the context of WWII, but it's revealing that Schonfield speaks in terms of thousands- not millions- definitely not 6 million.
"6 million" specifically hasn't occurred in this book. Elsewhere he cites 2 million Jews dead from WWII (p. 3 & 14).

"Anti-Semitism", Schonfield says, will ironically be the "means of the world's salvation", b/c it leads to Zionism presumably, which "touches Christianity" apparently.
It sounds Frankist too me- as in the idea of doing evil in order to do good eventually. Redemption through sin.

That's Jewry's perspective. The Jew sees "anti-Semitism" as a sin.
In the traditional Christian context, the real evil would be in allowing those who killed Christ to continue subsuming/subverting/blaspheming Christianity.

At this point, it's useful to take a look at the IHRA's "Working Definition of Antisemitism" in order to see how Jews define it:

The Jews' definition of "anti-Semitism" couldn't even all fit on one page, lol.
Essentially, anything that Jews don't like is considered "anti-Semitism":

I've always self-defined as an American & Christian first. And although I've never held a positively-connotated "anti-Semitic" identity personally, I agree w/ many "anti-Semites" who say that, practically speaking, an "anti-Semite" is someone the Jews don't like.

If you adhere to the official definition of "anti-Semitism" above, then it is impossible to be a Christian as it is impossible to tell the truth in normal, everyday situations about daily events.
To not be "anti-Semitic" means to not be practically Christian.

As Christ is the truth- the Logos- then distancing oneself from the truth implies distancing oneself from Christianity.
Since simply seeing patterns or affirming for instance that US politicians are more loyal to Israel than to America makes one technically an "anti-Semite"...

...at least in the Jews' understanding of that term, then we as Christians have to just assume the term is meaningless, arbitrary, & an aggressive weapon of attacking Christians & Christianity currently.
Jews leverage this misunderstanding of exactly what "anti-Semitism" is.

In the average American's mind today, "anti-Semitism" is equivalent to hate- or hating Jews "for no reason". There's a connotation of irrationality there, which the Jews have worked hard over the decades in order to inculcate into the American psyche.

However, if those same people saw the WD above, that it's immoral or hateful to see patterns, to embrace traditional Christian norms, or to affirm the bad behavior of Jewry generally, they'd reject the implication of "hate".
American apathy, however, enables a Jewish tyranny.

Schonfield claims that Jewish suffering doesn't make the big headlines, lol.
"Less injured people get the heavy type [of headlines]".
It's like, what world are these people even living in?
- Holocaust?
- Dreyfus Affair?
- Damascus Affair?
- Beilis Affair?
- Frank Affair?

As usual, it's clearly the opposite of what Jewry claims. In fact, the alleged sufferings of Jewry have been hammered into the memories of everybody over the last century. Anyone remember this:

Yet Jews like Schonfield still have the chutzpuh to go out there & publicly claim that somehow (unnamed) "other groups" receive the bigger headlines- as if Americans are just ignoring Jewish suffering!
And then one day for no reason...

Here starts this myth (now popular) that the US under FDR somehow didn't help the suffering Jewry over in Europe. The UN didn't help either apparently.
Jews still claim today that the UN is "anti-Semitic", proving the above point that that entire term is meaningless indeed.

And it's not just Nazis who associate Democracy w/ Judaism (p. 88). Jews themselves write books & have conferences based on the same idea.

And it's not just Nazis who associate Democracy w/ Judaism (p. 88). Jews themselves write books &amp...

Jews push Democracy in every other land- especially European ones- while paying lip-service to it in their own land of Israel. However, some Jews drink a lot more of the Jew-laid than others obviously.

American Jews have a vested interest in getting Americans to envision Israel as a Democracy.
It reinforces the "light unto the nations" idea that Jews are perpetuating in order to erect their New World Order.

Meanwhile Israel's "democracy" gets to be an ethno-state in reality while even the idea of ethno-states in the West are branded as the very "threat" to Democracy itself, lol.

"All the world", claims the author, "associates Jews w/ what it dislikes".
It's not just Nazis- Schonfield reminds us.
Maybe that should tell the Jews something. Just maybe the people don't like the Jews constantly telling them how to run the country or their family.

Jews have "stood at the graveside of all their persecutors", in fact, b/c like now in the Ukraine against Russia, Jews will always successfully get somebody else to fight their battles for them- as they did in both world wars & before.

"The world needs us", claims Schonfield in quoting Louis Golding, another Jew who wrote a similar book earlier.
Back then Jews were still peddling this obsolete notion that wherever Jewry goes "liberty" & even "free speech" inevitably follows.

But it seems all this sloganeering about Jews & how they bring liberty & enlightenment wherever they go was in reality just a means to an end- a mechanism to establish political hegemony over the Western world.
B/c today Jews are the antithesis of championing free speech:

A good example of this Jewish transition from championing free speech to championing censorship is what Jews have done to the legacy of Henry Ford, himself a great proponent of free speech who the Jews went to war against simply b/c he dared publish things that Jews didn't like.

What exactly was Ford saying that caused the Jews to be exposed so publicly in their charade as "crusaders of free speech"?:

Jews explicitly as Jews taking credit for the Statue of Liberty (p. 92), b/c by mid-century rather than integration w/ the American ethos deemed "anti-Semitic", Jews had opted to change that entire ethos itself via Cultural Pluralism, or as we say today "multiculturalism".

If Jewish suicides keep happening at the pace Schonfield apparently believes they were then, then the entire "New World Order" (p. 93) is jeopardy!

Here's an oft-repeated idea that Jews are the "human barometer" of world or national conditions.
I don't actually disagree w/ this expression, however the connotations I'd give it would be opposite those implied above. I agree w/ Codreanu that a country has the Jews it deserves.

Indeed. Why can't Jews just "suffer" like others?
Maybe it's b/c other people don't have these "highly placed Gentile friends" Jews do?
Per Schofield, Jew suffering doesn't make the headlines (p. 87) yet at the same time normal people are tired of the Jews' protests regardless.

Here Jews wish to set up a new Sanhedrin- as happened under Napoleon when they originally received legal emancipation.
Only this time, it would be "permanent" & "international", & Jews would judge the "manifold problems & disorders of men & nations" according to Judaism (p. 96).

Jews are God's Chosen People- a "light unto the nations" remember (p. 97).
So coincidentally for a World Court, Jews say they would be the perfect judges!

And that's why already prior to Schonfield publishing this text, the British War Cabinet as proxy for the Crown had already agreed that the "New World Order" should be pledged to the Jews.
Schonfield's merely elaborating in this book on how that pledge shall be fulfilled.

Here it is again (p. 97): the final disappearance of "anti-Semitism" is intimately linked by Jewry to their messianic era- this new "righteous World Order" that was to be constructed post-WWII.

And that is the end of "Negative Aspects" tonight. Ch. 7, which is next, is titled "Has Judaism a Programme?"
The biggest revelation to me reading along so far is just how close the relationship is between "ending 'anti-Semitism'" & the Jewish messianic age.

And it's why secular Jewry too is just as much involved in carrying out the pre-conditions for this coming era.
It's why even Euro elites in power today are so concerned w/ some supposed "epidemic of anti-Semitism", which every year seems to be on the increase & worse than ever.

As always thanks for following along w/ me, for liking, sharing, & commenting, & even for disagreeing & critiquing otherwise. So I'll be back hopefully tomorrow for the continuation of this text. Everybody have a good night!

Ch. 7⬇️is called "Has Judaism a Program?", & it's coming up tonight sporadically as I have time. After this, there is only one last chapter. Both of these last two chapters are shorter too.

It starts out contradicting what Schonfield has spelled out throughout this book earlier. He tells us- numerous times, in fact- that Judaism has no "program" per se or no goal of "world domination". And then he proceeds to explain how it's good for Jews to rule the world, lol.

I believe this is intimately related to the Jewish dichotomy of spirit. It's a duality where one part wants to assimilate w/ humanity earnestly while the other is compelled to carry through Judaism to the bitterest end. Page 99 prior reflects this in its contradiction.

It's a contradiction that a self-aware non-Jew would easily realize but one in which Jews are ultimately comfortable assuming. It's the duality rather than the unity in Jewry that itself is in contrast w/ the Christian (& Greek) idea of Logos, or truth.

This duality of Jewish spirit, too, I think is reflected in early proto-Christianity & what became Talmudic Judaism. It is present all through the ages & is reflected earlier in Zionism vs Bolshevism internally as Winston Churchill himself wrote about in the early 20th Century:

While Churchill points to a modern dichotomy in Jewry, I believe the split in the spirit is ancient as well as current. It's the Jew spirit vs the pseudo-Greek or Hellenic spirit that Jews aspire so much to personify w/in the West historically- the merging of them w/ us finally.

For Jews, there exists this seductive quality to the Greek spirit historically as for many Euros over the ages there has existed an analogous attraction to that of the Jew- for better or for worse. It's my contention that Schonfield's entire motive for messianism & that of...

...of Jews in general historically has been about this longing for union w/ humanity, this universality represented most acutely by the Greek spirit, which remember was key to Christianity. Since the Jew refuses Christ, he calculates the closest he can come is its Greek spirit.

All this is a long way for me to say that Judaism does in fact have a program- contrary to Schonfield's answered when asked directly. Although outsiders can clearly see a program at work here, for the typical Jew, he may not necessarily even realize the contradiction at play.

Self-deception is as powerful if not more so than premeditation on the part of the Jew. And so I believe this explains this eternal duality. On the one hand, Jewry's a people apart, a state w/in a state, & the light unto nations. On the other the Jew wants to merge w/ humanity.

So w/ that digression finished, I think we can move on to what Schonfield proposes in the way of this New World Order- his messianic ideal of humanity.
What I just explained above about the dichotomy of Jewish spirit explains why Schonfield wants to take credit for Christianity.

(p. 100) Schonfield's sincerely saying that Christianity's good is due to Jewry. And I'm almost sure if you could've asked him, Christianity's "bad" would most likely be attributed to its adherence to what Jews would categorize as the Greek, or Hellenic, spirit.

There's a book, which I'll maybe report on later, which delves deeper into this dichotomy between Greek & Jewish spirit in its explanation of modernity & secularity especially. For now, we move on (p. 101) where again we see Jews are assigned this "mission" to "restore" humanity.

That quote above is coming from a Catholic- Jacques Maritain, who wrote a book on "anti-Semitism" during this time. Schonfield's use of Maritain in this exact context typifies the syncretic & often utopian philosophy of religion in the early 20th Century.
en.wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_M…

Jacques Maritain - Wikipedia

To be sure, it was not only Jews promoting some sort of "world government" or "league of nations", etc.
What distinguished Jews from all others, however, was the alignment of this agenda w/ Noahidism & messianism w/in traditional Talmudic Judaism (& Kaballah).

Integral too to the syncretic ideal- the merging of all nations & religions- was Freemasonry. Although I have no proof of Schonfield's affiliation w/ the latter, it is relevant here that he did convert to Christianity later in life. He called himself a "liberal Hebrew Christian".

In 1956, Schonfield founded the Commonwealth of World Citizens to promote these syncretic, quasi-masonic ideals. My take on him thus far is that he was trying to adhere to the pseudo-Greek spirit w/in him, but he just kept getting pulled back to the Jewish b/c it was stronger.

Once again we see democracy, we see equity, justice, & peace. We see the slogan of "equity" today, but again we must ask ourselves: what does "peace" & "justice" ultimately mean to the Jew intent on subsuming the nativist, religious identity of the rest of humanity?

Nuremberg to the Jews was "justice", which we must keep in mind here or in the future. Likewise w/ "peace". The Jew is restless & compelled to mercantilist frenzy. He will only truly be at peace when his boot is firmly upon the throat of humanity.
youtube.com

I don't know who said it, but a "Talmudic justice is no justice at all" from a Christian perspective. This is b/c every definition to them- incl. truth itself- is carefully negotiated in terms of what is or what isn't "good for the Jews". So "justice" & "peace" follow from that.

Already in 1945 Schonfield could claim that the Church of his day was "closer to Judaism" than in 18 centuries previous, or that it's "coming back home", & that it's already been "reconverted to Judaism" (p. 103-4).
If this was/is the case, then why Jesus in the first place?

"Parochialism" is the "most limiting factor in the realization of peace" (p 105). Christians & Christianity "need the universal international outlook of Judaism" (p. 106). We see too today how Globalism abhors this parochialism, which is foreign to the mercantilist Jewish spirit.

If you believe as I do that Christianity & Judaism are the antitheses of one another, then there can be no "close cooperation" w/out the dissolving of one into the other. And we know which direction Schonfield wants this merging to go.

Globalists wish to take all that makes us unique around the world & level it to create the perfect consuming world citizen. Schonfield created the C-wealth of World Citizens. Judaism is the "leveling" (p. 15-17) instrument of homogenization. Only they call it "peace" & "justice".

Judaism- not Christianity- will be "incarnated" & "exponential among...the whole human family".
"Peace" in this program consists of a world where Christianity is not recognized b/c its absent altogether- having already been subsumed by Jewry's "ethnical monotheism" (p. 106).

And now we remember our talk prior about dual Jewish spirit, we remember how at the beginning of this chapter, Schonfield said Judaism had no program per se.
We remember all that b/c we now read this (p. 107):

This is a good example of how Jews through this dichotomy in spirit can move effortlessly from "Judaism has no programme per se" (p. 99) to "Judaism has a programme" (p. 107).
Alternatively Schonfield truly believes that both are true. Which is true at any given moment depends.

It depends on who he's talking to as well as how he personally ignores or adheres to his most innate impulses w/in the Jewish spirit (over the Greek one he intermittently aspires to). At least currently we get an admission above. It was anything but straightforward in my reading.

This brings us to Ch. 7's conclusion as I see it. We'll begin the last chapter 8 when I have time- hopefully tomorrow. Although it's the first of my Twitter book reports, I get a good idea of what to do or not do in the future. Thanks everyone for following, liking, & commenting.

@ObjectiveObse16 Nevermind. I'm re-reading your comment now & I see that you're saying you have a hard-copy that you already tried to scan- but that it didn't come out quite correctly. I will still keep an eye out for this text in the future however. Thanks.

Jacques Maritain - Wikipedia

Categories

More from this author

Related Threads

Popular Threads

Jacques Maritain - Wikipedia

Categories

More from this author

Related Threads

Popular Threads

Unroll Thread