24 Tweets 106 reads Feb 26, 2023
Money printing doesn't work like you think.
A thread.
1/
Without properly understanding money, itโ€™s basically impossible to connect the dots of the global macro puzzle
Yet, we assume we know all about money
Universities teach us that governments need money to fund their spending, Central Banks print the money we use, and banks...
2/
...lend and multiply customersโ€™ money in a fractional reserve banking system
Thatโ€™s literally all wrong
Our monetary system runs on two distinct tiers of money: real-economy money (potentially inflationary) and financial-sector money (potentially asset-price inflationary
3/
Governments and commercial banks print real-economy money.
Central Banks print financial-sector money.
Let's precisely define the two forms of money.
4/
Real-economy money is money used by us: non-financial private sector agents (e.g. households, corporates).
With it, we make transactions that contribute to economic activity.
The more real-economy money out there, the more likely economic growth will be stronger.
5/
Also, a rapid increase in real-economy money when the supply of goods and services canโ€™t keep up will most likely generate strong inflationary pressures
Financial-sector money is money used by financial entities: mostly banks, but also pension funds, asset managers etc
6/
Now, who prints what form of money and how does it work?
Today, real-economy money is mostly bank deposits held by the non-financial private sector (read: held by us). Cash represents the rest.
Every time commercial banks make a loan, new real-economy money is created.
7/
Banks don't lend reserves or existing deposits: as the Bank of England itself shows, when making new loans banks expand their balance sheet and literally credit your account out of nowhere.
Did you notice how the amount of reserves is irrelevant in the lending process?
8/
Banks' lending activity depends on:
1) The creditworthiness of the borrowers
2) The attractiveness of loan yields
3) The required capital and balance sheet costs (i.e. regulatory constraints)
More QE = more financial-sector money.
Not real-economy money.
9/
Conclusion: banks print real-economy money.
The other real-economy money printer is the government: come again?
Yep.
If the government spends more than it plans to collect taxes for (deficits), in most cases new real-economy money has been created.
10/
Government deficit spending increases the net worth of the private sectorโ€ฆwithout adding a liability to it!
Think about it: when the US government sent checks to its citizens, American people literally saw the amount of their spendable money increase out of nowhere.
11/
Deficit spending increases the amount of non-financial private sector deposits (i.e. real-economy money) as long as households donโ€™t need to purchase the Treasuries issued by the government itself.
This means deficit spending prints real-economy money...
12/
...and it increases the net worth of the private sector as households donโ€™t experience an increase in debt.
In other words, government deficits boost the financial wealth of the private sector.
In most cases, deficit spending = real-economy money printing.
13/
As shown, banks and the government print real-economy money.
Credit creation boosts aggregate demand and it can lead to inflationary pressures.
That's exactly what we have seen in 2020-2021: massive fiscal deficits & government-sponsored bank lending ended up overheating..
14/
..the economy, resulting in super strong real GDP growth and inflationary pressures on top.
My TMC Global Credit Impulse tracks the pace of real-economy money creation in inflation-adjusted terms in the 5 largest economies in the world.
15/
As you can see: rapid changes in the amount of real-economy money anticipate rapid changes in economic growth.
So: (in most cases) government deficits and bank lending prints real-economy money.
Not Central Banks - they print financial-sector money.
16/
Via QE and other monpol operations, Central Banks print bank reserves - you can think of them as money for banks
Banks use reserves to settle transactions & engage in monetary plumbing operations with each other: reserves can only be used by entities with a CB account
17/
With QE, the Central Bank changes the composition of the asset side of the financial institutions' balance sheet: it takes away bonds, and swaps them for reserves
Now financial institutions have less bonds and more reserves (banks) or financial-sector deposits (non-banks)
18/
As said before, banks donโ€™t lend reserves to the real economy: you can throw as many as you want to them, and it won't change their stance when it comes to lending.
Japan showed us that in the early 2000s already.
19/
Bank reserves (red) doubled (!) in 5 years as the BoJ went on with QE, and yet bank loans (blue) shrank by 25% in the same period.
With double the amount of reserves, banks lent less.
What if the Central Bank does QE with a pension fund instead?
20/
When that happens, the fund now owns less bonds (purple) but more deposits (red).
These deposits are not real-economy money: the pension fund canโ€™t directly spend them in activities boosting nominal growth.
But it can use them to purchase other financial assets.
21/
Bank deposits held by non-banks financial institutions are financial-sector money.
Not real-economy money.
In short: QE never prints real-economy money, regardless of the recipient (banks or non-banks).
QE only prints financial-sector money = bank reserves.
22/
Conclusions
All they told you about money printing is wrong.
Our monetary system runs on 2 different forms of money: real-economy and financial-sector money.
Governments and banks print real-economy money.
Central Banks print financial-sector money.
23/

Loading suggestions...