Why GDP per capita matters, especially one adjusted for inflation? It is generally the BEST proxy for judging the productivity of a large country's economy. GDP numbers especially those not adjusted for inflation are meaningless and tells us nothing about an economy's health.
India can not keep adding more people, this is what it has done up until now to boast of a 'growth rate'. Much of the growth numbers we kang about are created by the historic inflation in the US Dollar and population growth.
In light of this, the Indian growth story is nothing but a very rude joke. It was in the year 2007 India surpassed its British Raj era 1947 GDP per capita. 60 years of absolute stagnancy! Only inflation and population rose. Which was used to manufacture the Indian growth story.
Only promise India really saw was following the collapse of Japanese bubble form 1995 to 2005. Credit where due, because of the prime ministers Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee, and finances ministers Manmohan Singh and Jashwant Singh.
If with such a significant technological progress, internet to infrastructure, cheap flights, and what not.... we saw meagre 17% growth in GDP per capita between 1850 and 2007, a century and half! What promise does India really show? Little.
@waykar_m @pathak_abhigyan Ask these pajeets to start calculating economic output in terms of gold, and then they'd have a confused pikachu face lol. As then the value of current money and numbers would go even worse, way worse. I invite all pajeet nationalists to compare economic growth in Gold :)
@yoga_esh What globalization are you talking about? Despite globalization India barely grew its inflation adjusted GDP per capita by under 20% in 2007 from goddamn 1850. The time period is large enough to cover all times and scenarios. Theme is same, Indian economy only disappoints.
Loading suggestions...