1) People believe this stuff. 👇 I'm not sure exactly what creates it, but people genuinely believe this stuff.
Let me extrapolate on the insane and irrational lack of cognitive discernment using another example.
Let me extrapolate on the insane and irrational lack of cognitive discernment using another example.
2) Emotionally, this story seemed to fit a need.
An understandable yearning people have for explaining things and giving a logical framework for the feelings of inherent injustice within Arizona's elections.
An understandable yearning people have for explaining things and giving a logical framework for the feelings of inherent injustice within Arizona's elections.
3) To call attention to the issues within the story, is to create anger in the mind of the reader who needs to believe in the construct in order to reconcile the injustice. I get that. Believe me. I understand that.
But that doesn't change the batshit crazy of it.
But that doesn't change the batshit crazy of it.
4) To highlight that attorney John Thaler is a man of unstable disposition, is to be met with accusations that efforts to put the brakes on the story is an effort to "alinsky" the storyteller.
That's not the issue within the Thaler story.
That's not the issue within the Thaler story.
5) John Thaler wrote this lawsuit (link). It takes place long before he and Jacqueline Breger began pushing the Arizona Sinaloa cartel story.
Thaler WROTE THIS. READ IT:
nebula.wsimg.com
Thaler WROTE THIS. READ IT:
nebula.wsimg.com
6) If you did not read that lawsuit (#5), then don't keep going on this thread.
That lawsuit gives you insight into his stability and psychological mindset.
That lawsuit gives you insight into his stability and psychological mindset.
7) The second set of Thaler writings that gives you insight into his disposition is in the most recent divorce case. Again, read the background:
casetext.com
casetext.com
8) John Thaler, the man making AZ accusations through his proxy (girlfriend), Jacqueline Breger, is not a stable man. He might be a lawyer, but he is not stable. Stable people do not write those ramblings. A judge called him "delusional" read the lawsuits and try to disagree.
9) Sticking with this story because you need to believe it. Promoting this story because it reconciles things. Taking the claims of the guy who is creating this story at face value, is a big mistake.
10) This insanity being *enhanced* by Kari Lake, Sidney Powell, Mike Flynn, Mike Lindell et al, whom I support, is precisely what the media and Katie Hobbs crowd love to have in order to knock the legs out from under actual bad vote evidence in Arizona.
11) It's almost as if this train wreck, and the timing of this firehose of crazy, are simply too perfect for the genuinely corrupt Arizona officials and corporate media's use, to be organic.
12) If you wanted to protect a corrupt political system, and you wanted to create the ability to "alinsky" any inquiry into your corruption, the story weaved by John Thaler is exactly what you would want to have at your disposal to belittle those calling for an honest review.
13) The damage is done. What really matters now is all the downstream stuff, which could mean that nothing may change regarding the counting of votes for 2024, because this story will be used to protect the broken system itself, by the people who benefit from it.
16) Heavy sigh.
/End
/End
Loading suggestions...