Circle previously tweeted last week that they were able to withdraw all funds from Silvergate prior to the halting of withdrawals.
However, there is a lack of a similar tweet regarding SVB.
However, there is a lack of a similar tweet regarding SVB.
What does this mean for the rest of us?
Circle, of course, services USDC. The loss of some of their collateral does not mean that USDC goes to zero.
However, lack of knowledge of how much of their reserves are unavailable, is beginning to spur an on-chain bank run.
Circle, of course, services USDC. The loss of some of their collateral does not mean that USDC goes to zero.
However, lack of knowledge of how much of their reserves are unavailable, is beginning to spur an on-chain bank run.
Due to Circle being US-regulated, USDC has often been seen as a premium asset by DeFi projects.
This has resulted in many large stablecoins such as DAI and FRAX taking a large amount of USDC as backing, which could result in some second-order effects.
This has resulted in many large stablecoins such as DAI and FRAX taking a large amount of USDC as backing, which could result in some second-order effects.
We cannot speculate on USDC's current capitalisation, but with over 80% of their assets held at BNY Mellon, it would likely be an overstatement to think that USDC is not going to be around tomorrow.
We can only await Circle's official updates for now.
We can only await Circle's official updates for now.
Loading suggestions...