That people actually believe they can specify (in order to avoid?) red-flags base on premature personal conceptions, isolated fantasies, individual biases and intuitions suggest we'll never stop attempting to solve our problems using limited models that are far from accurate.
Can we have a clear understanding of what we may resent in a partner even though we have never had one before?
Can we have a clear picture of what we may resent in our partners base on what we resent in others?
Do we even resent or we think we resent?
Are our partners others?
Can we have a clear picture of what we may resent in our partners base on what we resent in others?
Do we even resent or we think we resent?
Are our partners others?
How many times do we resent something from afar but become able to live with it or even like it when it moves closer?
PK thought all papers carrying Gandhi's face were rupee until he understood what's money. Don't we think red-flags are red because the green ones are blurred?
PK thought all papers carrying Gandhi's face were rupee until he understood what's money. Don't we think red-flags are red because the green ones are blurred?
Perhaps we're all getting ahead of ourselves. Perhaps we need to understand the difference between what we think we resent and what we actually resent - a process that'll take more than just premature conceiving, typing into words and tweeting. Perhaps we need to live more...
... interact more, feel more, witness more and experience more. Perhaps that way we'll have a far more clear picture of our taste and preferences. Perhaps that'll even open more ways of identifying more important red-flags. Perhaps by sticking to our current models of premature..
.. personal conceptions that are very removed from reality, we risk red-flagging what are probably our theoretically unidentifiable but experientially vivid preference in partners. Perhaps we need to listen to our platonic whispers less & kantian counsels more. Perhaps we need...
..to treat feelings and emotions like the experience they're rather than the concepts in logic and bookkeeping that we're forcing them to be. Perhaps we need to trust experience more because it has more ways of proving wrong than any distance our slow minds can travel.
And perhaps I'm chatting nonsense because this too might be another inaccurate model of dealing better with these so-called red-flags. Perhaps perhaps perhaps perhaps........
Let's just leave everything to AllΓ’h and trust in His Mercy.
Let's just leave everything to AllΓ’h and trust in His Mercy.
Loading suggestions...