In 1848, Chicago *also* completed its 1st railroad. Within decades, the US had built as many miles of railroad as the rest of the world combined, and Chicago was at the center of that.
Water connections
➡️big markets emerge
➡️more profitable to build railways
➡️bigger markets
Water connections
➡️big markets emerge
➡️more profitable to build railways
➡️bigger markets
All these markets made Chicago into a hub, so it made sense to build huge airports early on.
This made Chicago into a global trade hub
(Map by @PythonMaps)
So this is how a small river stream caused by an ice age produced one of the biggest cities in the world:
This made Chicago into a global trade hub
(Map by @PythonMaps)
So this is how a small river stream caused by an ice age produced one of the biggest cities in the world:
Chicago:
➡️Shortest path from Mississippi Basin to Great Lakes
➡️Trade between both regions
➡️Markets emerge
➡️Invest in canals
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in railroads
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in roads
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in airports
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Massive global hub
➡️Shortest path from Mississippi Basin to Great Lakes
➡️Trade between both regions
➡️Markets emerge
➡️Invest in canals
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in railroads
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in roads
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Invest in airports
➡️Bigger markets
➡️Massive global hub
So why do some cities thrive and others don't?
Because transportation lines create network effects.
The more transportation lines cross at one point, the more trade, the more investment in more transportation lines, the more trade...
Because transportation lines create network effects.
The more transportation lines cross at one point, the more trade, the more investment in more transportation lines, the more trade...
Chicago is the perfect example, but look at 🇫🇷: the population follows rivers. The bigger the river confluences, the bigger the city. Same concept.
If you liked this thread, follow me. I write one of these threads a week or so.
Or better yet, subscribe to my newsletter to not miss anything. It's free!
unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com
Or better yet, subscribe to my newsletter to not miss anything. It's free!
unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com
These network effects mean it makes sense to make these lines cross as close to each other as possible, so big cities don't usually appear close to others: they would steal transportation lines from each other
So why do we have cities like Minnesota-St Paul or Dallas-Fort Worth?
So why do we have cities like Minnesota-St Paul or Dallas-Fort Worth?
I'll be writing about this in my newsletter!
What other cities do you know that illustrate the same pattern of growth as Chicago?
What about twin cities?
What other cities do you know that illustrate the same pattern of growth as Chicago?
What about twin cities?
Loading suggestions...