The supply is falling because of uncertainty for the developers.
Customers in the affordable segment are very price-sensitive.
Thus developers find it difficult to pass on any commodity (steel and cement) price rise. If they do, they fear losing out on the customers.
Customers in the affordable segment are very price-sensitive.
Thus developers find it difficult to pass on any commodity (steel and cement) price rise. If they do, they fear losing out on the customers.
Developers who build mid and luxury houses do not have to fear the same.
Also, the profit margin in the affordable segment ranges from about 8-10%, significantly lower than the mid and luxury segment.
Also, the profit margin in the affordable segment ranges from about 8-10%, significantly lower than the mid and luxury segment.
This is why medium and large developers build just 9% and 1% of affordable houses. Whereas small, informal developers build over 90% of them.
Supply-side measures:
1) Affordable Housing-in-Partnership (AHP): Developers that construct homes for low-income groups are given a ₹1.5 L subsidy per house.
1) Affordable Housing-in-Partnership (AHP): Developers that construct homes for low-income groups are given a ₹1.5 L subsidy per house.
Typically, an affordable house sells for ₹40 L, and assuming a 10% margin, the developer’s profit would be ₹4 L. And a ₹1.5 L subsidy on this is a very significant incentive.
2) In-situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR):
Developers replace existing slums with apartment buildings on the same land.
Slum households receive free housing on their land.
Private developers complete the project and acquire the slum land in return.
This is a win-win for both.
Developers replace existing slums with apartment buildings on the same land.
Slum households receive free housing on their land.
Private developers complete the project and acquire the slum land in return.
This is a win-win for both.
Demand-side measures:
3) Beneficiary-Led Construction (BLC): Low-income households get a ₹1.5 lakh subsidy to build or improve their own homes.
4) Credit-Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS): An interest subsidy of 6.5% is provided for 20 years on housing loans.
3) Beneficiary-Led Construction (BLC): Low-income households get a ₹1.5 lakh subsidy to build or improve their own homes.
4) Credit-Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS): An interest subsidy of 6.5% is provided for 20 years on housing loans.
Banks shy away from lending to low-income households due to the lack of formal income.
When they do, the rate would have to be much higher (~15%+) than a standard 9% home loan to account for risk.
When they do, the rate would have to be much higher (~15%+) than a standard 9% home loan to account for risk.
With the CLSS subsidising 6.5% of the interest, EMIs become affordable for customers. And banks who normally would not lend to these customers would also feel comfortable lending.
But there were problems with all of them.
But there were problems with all of them.
This is because this scheme only covers areas “notified” as a slum by the government.
But in India, 59% of urban slums are “non-notified”. Thus the benefits of these schemes simply don’t apply here.
But in India, 59% of urban slums are “non-notified”. Thus the benefits of these schemes simply don’t apply here.
The problem with Beneficiary-Led Construction:
To qualify for BLC, one must own some land. This leaves many ineligible for these housing schemes. And since the fund is transferred directly to the beneficiary, the problem of misusing the funds for other purposes is always there.
To qualify for BLC, one must own some land. This leaves many ineligible for these housing schemes. And since the fund is transferred directly to the beneficiary, the problem of misusing the funds for other purposes is always there.
And since this is a price-sensitive segment, any delay in the completion of the project adds uncertainty for the developer. The price of raw materials can increase, the borrowing cost can go up, and the buyer can refuse to buy the property.
Owning a home is an emotional milestone for anyone.
And while PMAY has its share of problems to overcome, the government is aggressively taking new steps to make this dream of every Indian come true.
And while PMAY has its share of problems to overcome, the government is aggressively taking new steps to make this dream of every Indian come true.
Here are a few notable ones:
1) Reduction in GST
GST applicable on affordable housing is just 1%, whereas it is charged 5% on projects other than affordable housing units.
1) Reduction in GST
GST applicable on affordable housing is just 1%, whereas it is charged 5% on projects other than affordable housing units.
Model 1:
Vacant houses of previous government schemes are converted into rental complexes. There are ~88,000 such houses available across 13 states/UTs in India.
Vacant houses of previous government schemes are converted into rental complexes. There are ~88,000 such houses available across 13 states/UTs in India.
Model 2:
Many businesses have a parcel of land vacant on their sites/factories. This model incentivises employers to build housing units for the workers on these lands.
This benefits both the employers as well as the workers.
Many businesses have a parcel of land vacant on their sites/factories. This model incentivises employers to build housing units for the workers on these lands.
This benefits both the employers as well as the workers.
The workers get decent housing near their workplace, which increases productivity and efficiency.
The employers earn a steady revenue stream and get tax exemption on any gains from these units.
The employers earn a steady revenue stream and get tax exemption on any gains from these units.
With this growth, the dream of escaping the slums and living a better life can become a reality for many people.
The government’s focus on the ‘Housing for All’ mission will ensure steady support to this sector, thus pushing it higher.
The government’s focus on the ‘Housing for All’ mission will ensure steady support to this sector, thus pushing it higher.
Loading suggestions...