Madueke reminds me of Bukayo Saka except he's more raw despite being older.
This may sound like criticism, but Saka is arguably the best winger in the world at the moment as he excels from a ball retention AND output-based perspective. That's abnormal.
The comparison is praise.
This may sound like criticism, but Saka is arguably the best winger in the world at the moment as he excels from a ball retention AND output-based perspective. That's abnormal.
The comparison is praise.
Wingers are often required to stay high and wide in the modern game, and that suits Madueke perfectly.
His whole game is based on holding the width on the right wing and here he has the qualities to excel.
As Madueke is predominantly left-footed, he can cut inside and create.
His whole game is based on holding the width on the right wing and here he has the qualities to excel.
As Madueke is predominantly left-footed, he can cut inside and create.
The real difference maker with Madueke, though, comes from the fact that he can also beat his man on the outside and strike through the ball with his weaker right foot.
He's very similar to Saka in the sense that both excel at getting a yard of space through dribbling and speed.
He's very similar to Saka in the sense that both excel at getting a yard of space through dribbling and speed.
He also has excellent associative qualities where he can create for others by being direct (half space crosses, byline crosses, through balls, etc) or via playmaking and combining.
He has a wonderful balance of being direct and combining patiently to work an angle to create.
He has a wonderful balance of being direct and combining patiently to work an angle to create.
The rawness, though, comes into his game in the sense that sometimes his dribbling can be 'clunky' and his touches can be heavy.
Now, this isn't to say his dribbling is like that all the time, because it's absolutely not - Madueke is actually a fantastic dribbler.
Now, this isn't to say his dribbling is like that all the time, because it's absolutely not - Madueke is actually a fantastic dribbler.
He did that from the left wing, too, all thanks to his ability to operate from that side of the pitch where he could receive centrally with his back to goal and dribble from out-to-in towards the goal ala Gareth Bale against Maicon.. another trait Bukayo Saka and Madueke possess.
The major separator between Madueke & Saka is their technical security. Madueke profiles as a technically secure winger, but, as I said, his dribbling can be 'on and off'.
Now, again, as I said, it's primarily good, & he certainly has the potential to iron those rough edges out.
Now, again, as I said, it's primarily good, & he certainly has the potential to iron those rough edges out.
£28.5m for Madueke's potential is well worth it, even if he never realises it due to injuries. What's clear, though, is that if he does stay fit then Chelsea have an incredible player on their hands.
The thought of Mudryk on one wing with Madueke on the other is mind-blowing.
The thought of Mudryk on one wing with Madueke on the other is mind-blowing.
The profiles and quality resemble that of the elites. Both have the potential to provide reliable output, kill their man in 1v1's, be technically secure, combine playmaking and direct play optimally, etc, etc.
The dynamic is similar to that of Saka and Martinelli at Arsenal.
The dynamic is similar to that of Saka and Martinelli at Arsenal.
Saka is lightening quick, but he's no Martinelli. The same can be applied to Madueke and Mudryk.
So, in an ideal world, Madueke irons out the rough edges in his game (which I expect him to as he absolutely has the quality to) to become the creative hub whereas Mudryk penetrates.
So, in an ideal world, Madueke irons out the rough edges in his game (which I expect him to as he absolutely has the quality to) to become the creative hub whereas Mudryk penetrates.
Now, of course Mudryk is much more than just a penetrator, but the simple dynamic makes sense and provides Chelsea with enough speed and dynamism in attack to kill teams in transitional situations.
Either way, though, it's clear Madueke is a sensational talent.
Either way, though, it's clear Madueke is a sensational talent.
Here's hoping he stays fit & realises that potential because the sky is the limit for him, particularly with the way football has evolved lately.
As I said at the start of the thread, Madueke's profile is one that optimally suits positional play teams. He needs that environment.
As I said at the start of the thread, Madueke's profile is one that optimally suits positional play teams. He needs that environment.
That's the thing about football - a player can have all of the quality in the world but they're not a sure thing to become a top player reliably due to injuries, the environment that they're in, the inability to deal with pressure, the struggle to commit work-ethic wise..
These are all variables that must be acknowledged and accounted for with any player, but what's clear is that Madueke excels mentally too.
Isaksson-Hurst, a former youth coach at Chelsea, said that Madueke is a 'mentality monster'.
If he stays fit, the sky is the limit.
Isaksson-Hurst, a former youth coach at Chelsea, said that Madueke is a 'mentality monster'.
If he stays fit, the sky is the limit.
However, much like Mudryk and all of these young talents at Chelsea, Madueke requires time, and not necessarily because he isn't ready yet, but because Chelsea themselves are in a transitional period where Potter is arguably failing to get the most out of the collective.
Loading suggestions...