2/ This transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing directly from Crow to Thomas.
Like the lavish trips Crow provided for the justice, Thomas failed to disclose the real estate deal as appears to be required by law.
propublica.org
Like the lavish trips Crow provided for the justice, Thomas failed to disclose the real estate deal as appears to be required by law.
propublica.org
3/ The sale put Crow in a new position: Owner of Thomas’ elderly mother’s house. She continued to reside in the home after the deal closed.
In fact, the new owner gave a major upgrade to his well-connected tenant’s place.
In fact, the new owner gave a major upgrade to his well-connected tenant’s place.
5/ A Crow company began paying the roughly $1500/year tax bill for the renovated property.
Thomas and his wife Ginni had paid the tax before the sale.
propublica.org
Thomas and his wife Ginni had paid the tax before the sale.
propublica.org
10/ Crow’s statement did not directly address why he also bought two vacant lots from Thomas down the street.
But he said that the lots were later sold to a builder “committed to improving the quality of the neighborhood and preserving its historical integrity.”
But he said that the lots were later sold to a builder “committed to improving the quality of the neighborhood and preserving its historical integrity.”
11/ Regarding the improvements & additions to the mother’s house, Crow said, “Improvements were also made to the Thomas property to preserve its long-term viability and accessibility to the public.”
12/ Ethics law experts said Crow’s intentions had no bearing on Thomas’ legal obligation to disclose the sale.
Federal law requires justices & other officials to disclose the details of most real estate sales of more than $1,000.
Federal law requires justices & other officials to disclose the details of most real estate sales of more than $1,000.
13/ “He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said former govt ethics lawyer Virginia Canter from watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas & his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”
14/ The justice’s failure to report the sale suggests “Thomas was hiding a financial relationship with Crow,” said Kathleen Clark, a legal ethics expert at Washington University in St. Louis who reviewed years of Thomas’ disclosure filings.
16/ The revelation of a direct financial transaction between Thomas & Crow casts their relationship in a new light.
We previously reported that Thomas has accepted luxury travel from Crow for decades, including private jet flights & superyacht cruises:
propublica.org
We previously reported that Thomas has accepted luxury travel from Crow for decades, including private jet flights & superyacht cruises:
propublica.org
18/ And sign up for the Big Story newsletter to get all our major investigations as soon as they’re published:
propublica.org
propublica.org
Loading suggestions...