In short: India's foreign policy "software" is broken
What does that mean?
-๐ฎ๐ณ's Foreign Ministry lacks the capacity to carry out policies
-๐ฎ๐ณ's foreign affairs media, think-tanks * universities don't produce quality work
-Public remains largely uninterested in foreign policy
What does that mean?
-๐ฎ๐ณ's Foreign Ministry lacks the capacity to carry out policies
-๐ฎ๐ณ's foreign affairs media, think-tanks * universities don't produce quality work
-Public remains largely uninterested in foreign policy
Why does that matter?
As ๐ฎ๐ณ's economy grows, it will need a well-informed public, strong researchers & a capable Foreign Ministry to achieve Foreign policy goals
While India may acquire the "hardware" for great power status (economic growth), it lacks the "software" needed
As ๐ฎ๐ณ's economy grows, it will need a well-informed public, strong researchers & a capable Foreign Ministry to achieve Foreign policy goals
While India may acquire the "hardware" for great power status (economic growth), it lacks the "software" needed
That size means that ๐ฎ๐ณ's diplomats, despite being highly skilled, are overworked & distracted
Daniel Markey says that the MEA suffers from a "One Track" problem
When US diplomats were working on nuclear deal w. ๐ฎ๐ณ, they noticed that the deal tied up the MEA's focus totally
Daniel Markey says that the MEA suffers from a "One Track" problem
When US diplomats were working on nuclear deal w. ๐ฎ๐ณ, they noticed that the deal tied up the MEA's focus totally
Other priorities like agriculture, trade suffered because MEA could only handle one thing at a time
Pushing several parallel priorities, which is a hallmark of a great power, is a problem for ๐ฎ๐ณ
(My take: This is one of the most common complaints I hear from foreign diplomats)
Pushing several parallel priorities, which is a hallmark of a great power, is a problem for ๐ฎ๐ณ
(My take: This is one of the most common complaints I hear from foreign diplomats)
While MEA has four Secretary-rank officers, Amb. Rana (@diplophile) says the others are underworked
This is unlike China, which has many Vice-Ministers, who are autonomous & almost equally powerful
Equally distributing power & decision making authority will lead to๐efficiency
This is unlike China, which has many Vice-Ministers, who are autonomous & almost equally powerful
Equally distributing power & decision making authority will lead to๐efficiency
3. Long Range planning & expertise
According to Kanti Bajpai, ๐ฎ๐ณ's Foreign Ministry lacks the ability to plan for long term crises
Its diplomats are too caught up in day-to-day challenges
MEA also lacks expertise on defence, tech etc that other foreign ministries have
According to Kanti Bajpai, ๐ฎ๐ณ's Foreign Ministry lacks the ability to plan for long term crises
Its diplomats are too caught up in day-to-day challenges
MEA also lacks expertise on defence, tech etc that other foreign ministries have
For example, while America uses industry associations like USIBC & NGO's like the Nat'l Democratic Institute to push for foreign policy priorities abroad, ๐ฎ๐ณ's MEA has tended to exclude these expert groups
๐ฎ๐ณ doesn't have a diplomatic network in the same way France or the US do
๐ฎ๐ณ doesn't have a diplomatic network in the same way France or the US do
2โฃ. Media, Think-Tanks & Unis
These entities also make up ๐ฎ๐ณ's foreign policy ecosystem
However, each of these remain underdeveloped tools in foreign policy
Media lacks the resources to train journalists in foreign languages, send them abroad & develop them as experts
These entities also make up ๐ฎ๐ณ's foreign policy ecosystem
However, each of these remain underdeveloped tools in foreign policy
Media lacks the resources to train journalists in foreign languages, send them abroad & develop them as experts
Meanwhile, Markey finds that think-tanks are often cut out of the foreign policy decision making process
Those scholars with the most access are former diplomats & security officials
That makes it hard to develop external expertise outside of the Ministry
Those scholars with the most access are former diplomats & security officials
That makes it hard to develop external expertise outside of the Ministry
(Quick aside: as a researcher for the ORF, I was told that journalists had far more access than subject experts)
Unis are part of the problem since there are few good IR programs in the country
Quality research & output, which then informs diplomats, is lacking
Unis are part of the problem since there are few good IR programs in the country
Quality research & output, which then informs diplomats, is lacking
China does it differently
The China Institute for Contemporary International Relations, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences & the China Institute of International Studies have thousands of researchers
They work closely with the Foreign Ministry & advise it
The China Institute for Contemporary International Relations, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences & the China Institute of International Studies have thousands of researchers
They work closely with the Foreign Ministry & advise it
3โฃ. The General Public
Scholars point out that there is no domestic constituency of support for foreign policy among the public
It's still seen as an elite subject removed from the everyday priorities of citizens
Thus support for๐the MEA's budget or key policy priorities
Scholars point out that there is no domestic constituency of support for foreign policy among the public
It's still seen as an elite subject removed from the everyday priorities of citizens
Thus support for๐the MEA's budget or key policy priorities
๐ฎ๐ณ's govt is using events like the G20 to better inform the public about foreign affairs
A more informed & educated citizenry, it is assumed, will prove more accepting of๐expenditures on foreign affairs & developing "software" because of desire to make ๐ฎ๐ณ a great power
A more informed & educated citizenry, it is assumed, will prove more accepting of๐expenditures on foreign affairs & developing "software" because of desire to make ๐ฎ๐ณ a great power
Loading suggestions...