Because Japan was working with Germany in an evil Axis bent on world domination, the US was forced to go to war with them too. Notice how nicely this fits with the broader 20th century story of the US utterly destroying all her enemies and conquering the world in self-defense.
3/
3/
The problem with this story is that every part of it is wrong and the opposite true. The ânegotiationsâ in question were anything but good-faith, Japanâs attack was neither a surprise nor unprovoked, and FDR had been looking for well over a year for an excuse to enter the war.
4/
4/
The notion was, of course, ridiculous, but the Nazi hate/paranoia was very real (e.g. why by early 1942, US military power was mostly concentrated in Europe, not the Pacific).
Note also that this hate pre-existed Nazi invasions or crimes, and was not a function of them.
6/
Note also that this hate pre-existed Nazi invasions or crimes, and was not a function of them.
6/
Nonetheless, FDR knew a direct attack on the US was the only way to make this happen; the only way to generate enough popular will to sustain the American people through the sacrifice of a generation of young men on the altar of global liberalism in another European slaughter.
9/
9/
FDRâs critics were not unwise to his dangerous conflict of interests, and the ships were still burning when rumors began that he had instigated the attack.
To deflect these accusations, the administration made a number of assertions ranging from speculation to outright lies.
11/
To deflect these accusations, the administration made a number of assertions ranging from speculation to outright lies.
11/
Their defense hinged on a few key claims, including negligence by the Hawaii commanders, laxity and poor discipline among the personnel there (later investigations would disprove both these claims), and most importantly:
No warning.
Now, some specifics, from the beginning.
12/
No warning.
Now, some specifics, from the beginning.
12/
Some key things to remember when reading this (highly condensed/simplified) timeline:
1) FDR was noted by several of his biographers to have been an obsessive reader not only of intelligence summaries, but also raw field reports and diplomatic/military intercepts themselves
13/
1) FDR was noted by several of his biographers to have been an obsessive reader not only of intelligence summaries, but also raw field reports and diplomatic/military intercepts themselves
13/
That FDR would explicitly divulge the conspiracy to Smith sounds almost fanciful, and one might be justified in dismissing it, except for one thing: records indicate there actually was a surge of medical personnel & supplies to PH just before Dec 7th.
29/
usni.org
29/
usni.org
Itâs unclear exactly how many of these Naval dispatches (roughly 188, declassified in 1991) were decoded and translated before 7 Decâprimarily because the NSA has âlostâ over 100,000 of the relevant documents that would tell us thisâbut we know the number was substantial.
42/
42/
A member of the armyâs Signal Intelligence Service later wrote, âShortly after midday on SaturdayâŠ[we] knew that war was as certain as deathâ and âit was known in our agency that Japan would surely attack us in the early afternoon of the following dayâŠNot an iota of doubt.â
48/
48/
2 PM, 6 Dec - Johann Ranneft, Dutch attachĂ© to ONI, notes in his diary: âAt my request, they show me the location of the 2 carriers west of Honolulu.â
The carriers were located the day prior by the San Francisco naval station via radio direction and reported directly to FDR.
49/
The carriers were located the day prior by the San Francisco naval station via radio direction and reported directly to FDR.
49/
Hopkins commented that it was âtoo badâ Japan would have the advantage of striking the first blow and the US could not, to which Roosevelt replied, âNo, we canât do that. We are a democracy and a peaceful people. But we have a good record.â
No warning sent to Pearl Harbor.
51/
No warning sent to Pearl Harbor.
51/
Of all the above warnings & indicators, none was sent or made known to Adm. Kimmel or General Short at PH, with the single exception of a notable Japanese civilian radio transmission (known as a âWinds Executeâ), which only reached Short on 4 Dec via British intel directly.
52/
52/
For a primary source play-by-play of FDR and his inner circleâs egregious negligence on 6-7 December, see the Minority Report to the â46 congressional investigation (the official finding left FDRâs culpability unanswered), starting at No. 20.
ibiblio.org
55/
ibiblio.org
55/
It is simply inconceivable that given
a) the *many* warnings and indicators that high-level admin officials received prior to Dec 7
b) US knowledge of Japanese war plans
c) intercepted Japanese communications, that PH was in any sense whatsoever a âsurprise attackâ.
56/
a) the *many* warnings and indicators that high-level admin officials received prior to Dec 7
b) US knowledge of Japanese war plans
c) intercepted Japanese communications, that PH was in any sense whatsoever a âsurprise attackâ.
56/
Keep in mind also that the beltway establishment of 1941 was superbly competent. It defies reason that an accurate intel pictureâespecially one of this volume and importanceâwould be withheld from those who needed it most (the PH commanders) by mere oversight.
58/
58/
âPearl Harbor Mythâ author George Victor says the persistent ahistorical WWII narrative is basically an emotional problem: âA nation often pulls itself out of [crisis] by creating mythâa melodramatic account, mixing fact and fantasyâwhich becomes a sacred part of its historyâ
62/
62/
Loading suggestions...