In 1928 and 2006, the yield curve inverted but stocks rallied and unemployment was low
The 2023 environment seems no different
A thread comparing historical inversions π§΅
The 2023 environment seems no different
A thread comparing historical inversions π§΅
11/ Today's market mirrors the 1989 scenario, with markets rallying post-inversion
However, the depth of the 1989 inversion was brief and shallow (-0.5%), unlike today's
However, the depth of the 1989 inversion was brief and shallow (-0.5%), unlike today's
14/ The 2006 recession taught us that a strong economy before a downturn doesn't necessarily mean a less severe recession
If we follow the same path, stocks could continue to rise for another 7 months before a recession hits
If we follow the same path, stocks could continue to rise for another 7 months before a recession hits
18/ The most analogous scenarios to the 2023 yield curve inversion are those of 1929 and 2006, considering:
- Equity price action
- Labor market resilience
- Extent of the yield curve inversion
- Equity price action
- Labor market resilience
- Extent of the yield curve inversion
19/ Key Takeaways:
- The longest gap between an inversion and a recession is approximately 16-17 months (1928)
- Market strength during inversion doesn't predict recessionβs severity
- Deeper inversions result in lower PMIs
- Todayβs inversion resembles 1928 and 2006
- The longest gap between an inversion and a recession is approximately 16-17 months (1928)
- Market strength during inversion doesn't predict recessionβs severity
- Deeper inversions result in lower PMIs
- Todayβs inversion resembles 1928 and 2006
20/ Thanks for reading!
If you found this thread valuable, please β€οΈ and π the first tweet below
And follow @gameoftrades_ for more market insights, finance and investment strategies
If you found this thread valuable, please β€οΈ and π the first tweet below
And follow @gameoftrades_ for more market insights, finance and investment strategies
Loading suggestions...