Discuss in detail the husband and his family were found guilty under section 498A,406, IPC 34,354A.
I have read this order & according to my understanding the counsel for the husband side could not present his case properly which resulted in conviction.
1/
I have read this order & according to my understanding the counsel for the husband side could not present his case properly which resulted in conviction.
1/
>The lawyers of the husband side did not highlight the aspect of " Delay in FIR " in the whole case.
>The serious contradictions of the Prosecution witnesses were also not pointed out.
> The credibility of PW1 has also not been questioned.
2/
>The serious contradictions of the Prosecution witnesses were also not pointed out.
> The credibility of PW1 has also not been questioned.
2/
>In this Case, the FIR was partially quashed, whose defense could not take any advantage.
> No question was asked on the veracity of Electronic Evidence
> The defense remained mute spectator to the huge expenditure incurred in the marriage.
3/
> No question was asked on the veracity of Electronic Evidence
> The defense remained mute spectator to the huge expenditure incurred in the marriage.
3/
> In this case, the husband could easily prove his good behavior towards the wife in the court. The husband had helped his wife in her studies and job. Even on this the defense side remained silent. The whole #498A could have fallen on it.
4/
4/
> In this case , the husband and his family have been acquitted under section 313. The acquittal is based on the doctor's report and not on the basis of suspicion. Regrettably, the defense could not take advantage of this.
5/
5/
I am sorry that the husband is suffering because of the mistake of the lawyers .This order will soon be challenged. I will give all my help in this case. Don't be under the illusion that the prosecution is bound to prove the case,
you have to read & understand the law.
6/6
you have to read & understand the law.
6/6
Loading suggestions...