"This is wrong bro. She can just accuse you of rape. So, better stop when she says so."🤡🤡
The issue I have with men who cower in fear of what women have to say about consent is that, they don't see how they enable such fear by themselves.
In reality, "Can I kiss you?" will most likely be met with a "No!" because like every woman, she won't want to be perceived as "cheap."
It's even insulting because what are you trying to imply? That she kisses every man just because they asked nicely.
You should be able to know when to go in for a kiss by mere observation, and she'd be receptive.
Then, this CONSENT thingy, No means No, and all. Does it go both ways?
Or it's solely expected of men to ask, but women can go in for the kill, after all, you are her man.
In reality asking, "Do you want to fuck?" will most likely be met with a "no" but "Let's go into my room, now?", will probably get you laid.
Nigerian women tend to employ some kind of resistance because to them, the man has to want her so badly to where he'd apply pressure.
You'd hear things like, "Just because I turned you down, doesn't mean I don't want you. I wanted you to show me you wanted me."🤡
You could even argue that such happens with women in general, but then they have created some kind of construct they aim to use when it's time to make a man's life a living hell.
The opposite of such situation is still a cause for concern, because after she has said "Stop!" and you did, because you are afraid of being accused of rape, what's stopping her from accusing you anyway?
Nothing!!
The issue I have with men who cower in fear of what women have to say about consent is that, they don't see how they enable such fear by themselves.
In reality, "Can I kiss you?" will most likely be met with a "No!" because like every woman, she won't want to be perceived as "cheap."
It's even insulting because what are you trying to imply? That she kisses every man just because they asked nicely.
You should be able to know when to go in for a kiss by mere observation, and she'd be receptive.
Then, this CONSENT thingy, No means No, and all. Does it go both ways?
Or it's solely expected of men to ask, but women can go in for the kill, after all, you are her man.
In reality asking, "Do you want to fuck?" will most likely be met with a "no" but "Let's go into my room, now?", will probably get you laid.
Nigerian women tend to employ some kind of resistance because to them, the man has to want her so badly to where he'd apply pressure.
You'd hear things like, "Just because I turned you down, doesn't mean I don't want you. I wanted you to show me you wanted me."🤡
You could even argue that such happens with women in general, but then they have created some kind of construct they aim to use when it's time to make a man's life a living hell.
The opposite of such situation is still a cause for concern, because after she has said "Stop!" and you did, because you are afraid of being accused of rape, what's stopping her from accusing you anyway?
Nothing!!
Many of you have read stories about women accusing men of rape, because those men saved their lives, had sex with them drunk even when the man was also drunk, and because she regretted the sex even after consenting.
So, what use is this consent in the long run? A tool to control and manipulate men, that's what it is.
It aims to get men to fear women, because she could destroy your life with mere accusation and because she knows you won't put a bullet in her brains or a knife in her heart.
She knows you'd take the fool's route by "forgiving her" and putting her in your prayers.
The point of the message is that, a woman who wants you and is ready to raise her thighs up for you to remove her panties wants you, don't ruin it by being a scared moron.
This is because whatever your fear is, it doesn't matter, after all you've give her power of autem imperator, making her your judge, jury and executioner.
If she says stop and you stop, and she wants to accuse you of rape, what's your defence?
If you say stop and she doesn't, and you leave, what's stopping you from being accused of rape?
If she says stop, and you continue, and she allows it and moans and even cums and kisses you, what's stopping her from accusing you?
The problem is that she knows that you've given her so much power over you to where, she could muster such thought and nothing will happen to her.
So, what use is this consent in the long run? A tool to control and manipulate men, that's what it is.
It aims to get men to fear women, because she could destroy your life with mere accusation and because she knows you won't put a bullet in her brains or a knife in her heart.
She knows you'd take the fool's route by "forgiving her" and putting her in your prayers.
The point of the message is that, a woman who wants you and is ready to raise her thighs up for you to remove her panties wants you, don't ruin it by being a scared moron.
This is because whatever your fear is, it doesn't matter, after all you've give her power of autem imperator, making her your judge, jury and executioner.
If she says stop and you stop, and she wants to accuse you of rape, what's your defence?
If you say stop and she doesn't, and you leave, what's stopping you from being accused of rape?
If she says stop, and you continue, and she allows it and moans and even cums and kisses you, what's stopping her from accusing you?
The problem is that she knows that you've given her so much power over you to where, she could muster such thought and nothing will happen to her.
Stop ignoring our laws and cultural reality and adopting all these foreign and/or movie depicted yardsticks of consent.
Using them to define consent is a mental exercise for posturers, attention-seekers, or those with limited sexual experience.
I am not saying you shouldn't seek consent, but we must employ common sense and know when to and when not to engage in certain things.
Marital rape women often cry about that's committed by men, isn't exclusively a male thing. Women force their husbands, too.
Men would wake up to a blow job, and have to fall in line even when they aren't in the mood, but it's because consent has been pre-approved.
We have our own legal, proper and more natural ways of communicating consent that work for the most part without the mechanical...Requirement of questions like "Can I kiss you?" Or "Can I touch your clit?"
To highlight the impracticality of the prerequisite of seeking express verbal consent, who gets to decide who needs to ask the question at different points?
If a man asks a woman if he can kiss her and she acquiesces, and while they're kissing, she grabs his penis and fondles them, is that sexual assault?
He sought consent to kiss her. But she didn't seek consent to grab his willy. Or is the consent requirement in this alternate reality unidirectionally male-specific?
Let's take the madness a bit further: If she does ask for consent to grab his penis, does he need consent to fondle her breasts since consenting to kissing doesn't mean...Consenting to breast fondling?
And as the back and forth goes between different stages of the sexual encounter, at what point do they have sex and what will be the quality of that sex considering spontaneity, unpredictability and tension are key ingredients for great sex?
We are not who we think we are no matter how much posturing we do on the internet or how much we want to copy what we see on our screens from dysfunctional cultures.
We are not those guys.
Ask a Nigerian lady "Can I kiss you?", and the majority of the time, their answer will be negative even when she has a huge water fountain flowing underneath her thighs.
Using them to define consent is a mental exercise for posturers, attention-seekers, or those with limited sexual experience.
I am not saying you shouldn't seek consent, but we must employ common sense and know when to and when not to engage in certain things.
Marital rape women often cry about that's committed by men, isn't exclusively a male thing. Women force their husbands, too.
Men would wake up to a blow job, and have to fall in line even when they aren't in the mood, but it's because consent has been pre-approved.
We have our own legal, proper and more natural ways of communicating consent that work for the most part without the mechanical...Requirement of questions like "Can I kiss you?" Or "Can I touch your clit?"
To highlight the impracticality of the prerequisite of seeking express verbal consent, who gets to decide who needs to ask the question at different points?
If a man asks a woman if he can kiss her and she acquiesces, and while they're kissing, she grabs his penis and fondles them, is that sexual assault?
He sought consent to kiss her. But she didn't seek consent to grab his willy. Or is the consent requirement in this alternate reality unidirectionally male-specific?
Let's take the madness a bit further: If she does ask for consent to grab his penis, does he need consent to fondle her breasts since consenting to kissing doesn't mean...Consenting to breast fondling?
And as the back and forth goes between different stages of the sexual encounter, at what point do they have sex and what will be the quality of that sex considering spontaneity, unpredictability and tension are key ingredients for great sex?
We are not who we think we are no matter how much posturing we do on the internet or how much we want to copy what we see on our screens from dysfunctional cultures.
We are not those guys.
Ask a Nigerian lady "Can I kiss you?", and the majority of the time, their answer will be negative even when she has a huge water fountain flowing underneath her thighs.
Loading suggestions...