Thanks for the tweet. I'll address three points:
1. Locke justified the genocide and ethnic cleansing of native Americans because according to his labour theory, only those people who can cultivate a land have the right to ownership. [1]
1/4
1. Locke justified the genocide and ethnic cleansing of native Americans because according to his labour theory, only those people who can cultivate a land have the right to ownership. [1]
1/4
2. In the podcast, I didn't mention Mill's understanding of property rights. However, I did mention both Locke and Mill together because they are both important philosophers in the liberal traditions. Not because they had a similar view when it comes to property rights.
2/4
2/4
I, in fact, don't know about Mill's property rights.
3. As for the Mu'tazilla, I admit the mistake. They didn't reject the entire hadith corpus but they were extremely sceptical of hadiths. I personally haven't read enough about the beliefs and doctrines of the Mu'tazilla.
3/4
3. As for the Mu'tazilla, I admit the mistake. They didn't reject the entire hadith corpus but they were extremely sceptical of hadiths. I personally haven't read enough about the beliefs and doctrines of the Mu'tazilla.
3/4
@SimsimMaturidi @Abdulla82462940 and other brothers are in a better position to talk about this topic than me.
4/4
4/4
References:
[1] Domenico Lusordo, Liberalism a Counter-History, p. 24
Also see Locke, Two Treatises, pp. 129, 162, 134. 109 Ibid., pp. 136, 139, 152, 178.
And Anthony Pagden, โThe Struggle for Legitimacy and the Image of Empire in the Atlantic to c. 1700โ, in Canny, ed.
[1] Domenico Lusordo, Liberalism a Counter-History, p. 24
Also see Locke, Two Treatises, pp. 129, 162, 134. 109 Ibid., pp. 136, 139, 152, 178.
And Anthony Pagden, โThe Struggle for Legitimacy and the Image of Empire in the Atlantic to c. 1700โ, in Canny, ed.
The Origins of Empire, p. 43.
Here are some insights on the different understanding of private property between the Europeans and Native Americans.
Loading suggestions...