๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธๆ‰พๅ‡บ็—…ๆฏ’็œŸ็›ธ-5๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธๆ‰พๅ‡บ็—…ๆฏ’็œŸ็›ธ-5๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@zijizhanchu_5

41 Tweets 6 reads Nov 08, 2023
@Daoyu15 7-1/ @Daoyu15
And of course, their โ€œvaccinesโ€ also caused more deaths than they are supposed to fight against.
@Daoyu15 8-1/ @Daoyu15
Or perhaps intentionally so. The viral sequence with the patented CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG sequence is needed to generate a proper immune response.
In fact first infection after mRNA vaccination lead to less immune response than with no mRNA vaccinationโ€”to the point
@Daoyu15 8-2/ @Daoyu15
that 1: there is no prevention of future infections at all. 2: mRNA vaccination increases the chances of being infected multiple times. No CGG-CGG, no immunogenicity. archive.md
The current mRNA vaccines are of negative efficacy and are actively
@Daoyu15 8-3/ @Daoyu15
dangerous.
And the cause? The entire CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG provide both high efficacy as a vaccine strain (when inactivated or further cold adapted) and the Proline provide efficient growth in vaccine-relevant and stock-relevant cell lines.
archive.md
@Daoyu15 8ๅผ•1-1/ @Daoyu15
Guess what CGG-CGG is good for and why both Moderna and Pfizer/BioNtech increases the chances of repeated infections?
Quite unfortunately, if you actually see the vaccinated vs unvaccinated reinfection rates, vaccinated is much more likely.
@Daoyu15 8ๅผ•1-6/ @Daoyu15
reasonโ€”it is in fact one of the most powerful adjuvants known.
archive.ph
In fact, selection pressure against an FCS in wild sarbecoviruses is so strong that it does not exist even as minor fractions within samples taken from the wild.
@Daoyu15 8ๅผ•1-8/ @Daoyu15
vaccine. It already came with its own adjuvant.
@Daoyu15 9ๅผ•gab1-1/ @Daoyu15
Odd behavior of SARS-CoV-2 S
@Daoyu15 10-1/ @Daoyu15
And wellโ€”field work is too dangerous. And yes. Most arenโ€™t in-silico. Just see how they are showcasing their grave COIs.
@Daoyu15 10-2/ @Daoyu15
ๅŽŸๅ›พ็‰‡
11-3/ @Daoyu15
incomplete inoculum clearance to infect 1โ€”is 42 virions per ml. The max shedding in inoculated animals is 10000 live virions per ml. This is an a transmission dead end. Less G614 virions per ml of snot than the minimal needed for D614 infection to a human. More
@Daoyu15 11-4/ @Daoyu15
surveillance is in fact going on, and the most they got are 2/20 minks and no raccoon dogs in a facility with both.
archive.md archive.md
the absence of natural infections in this species and in the wildlife trade in China is obvious
@Daoyu15 11-5/ @Daoyu15
with the complete absence of further spillovers or other spillovers anywhere outside Wuhan, neither in Hubei nor in Guangdong which is the central distribution hub of all wildlife trade and consumption in China. archive.md
Unfortunately the animals
@Daoyu15 11-6/ @Daoyu15
correlated with their native viruses and not SARS-CoV-2.
Whatever that brought it to Wuhan, be it virologists themselves or their sampling programs, or the result generated from their sampling programs, are not a part of the normal wildlife trade in China and is
@Daoyu15 11-7/ @Daoyu15
the direct result of virologist action. web.archive.org
Sampling humans from southeast Asia and ordering 500+ civets and raccoon dogs over 3 years from the market next door for experimenting and experimenting on? That is how you get a virus that doesnโ€™t
@Daoyu15 11-8/ @Daoyu15
exist in Hubei into Wuhan and in the same time not infecting any other locations in China.
In fact, all 3 samples that are different between 2021 and 2023 are also samples that have additional datasets uploaded in 26/03/2023 after an 03-10/03/2023 upload. Sample
@Daoyu15 11-9/ @Daoyu15
A20 have distinct host composition between the 03-10/03/2023 (without lineage reads) and 26/03/2023 upload, which is not expected from โ€œviral amplicon sequencingโ€ (with lineage A reads) which does not perturb the host reads if genuinely from the same sample. Again,
@Daoyu15 11-10/ @Daoyu15
any sane sequencing lab bias their flow cells like this, and they also happened to remove the sewage well samples that is bad for their wildlife stall rhetoric.
And of course, the fact that the related viruses are found all in the golden triangle area (belt and
@Daoyu15 11-11/ @Daoyu15
road, test cave, not near animal farms) And the fact that nearly all wildlife sales are still found in Guangdong and Guangxi,
Makes an market spillover extremely improbable without other spillovers outside Wuhan, without the effect of virology research.
@Daoyu15 11-12/ @Daoyu15
The โ€œboot signaturesโ€ seen in later samples from โ€œwildlife stall Aโ€.

Loading suggestions...