I think they always self-conceived as communities defending themselves but they had a military function and would actively engage in hostilities. By 10/7 theyโd clearly largely lost their combat capabilities, just civilians living in this kind of paramilitary infrastructure
If you were trying to occupy the perimeter (a legitimate military objective) theyโre the fortifications you would have to take, I have no idea how a formal military trying to comply with laws of war would navigate it. Really a nightmare situation
It was always both at the same time! Agrarian communes in militarily strategic locations, that were armed and coordinated with the formal military to act as a first line of defense
x.com
x.com
Israel has an exceptionally militarized society and also a whole conceptual framework obscuring the essentially aggressive nature of a โbuild a new nation where other people livedโ project, and it extends to obscuring when youโre actively participating in hostilities
Kibbutzniks would go out in organized squads to fight off Palestinian incursions in the hills, conceiving of themselves as acting in self/community defense when that is just clearly acting as a paramilitary
Loading suggestions...