1/4. Gerald, if you really care about "facts, evidence, the truth or science," then why did you ignore this question?
@GeraldKutney 2/4. The climate debate is about whether calling warm periods "climate optimums" (as scientists & historians have done for over a century) is correct (as I contend), or incorrect (as the climate industry pretends).
@GeraldKutney 3/4. The scientific evidence is compelling that rising CO2 levels, and consequent modest climate change, are both beneficial, just as Arrhenius predicted, over a century ago. Here are some relevant, high quality, papers:
sealevel.info
sealevel.info
@GeraldKutney 4/4. To understand politicized issues like climate change, you need balanced information. If you think CO2 emissions are harmful, you aren't getting it. But I'm here to help:
sealevel.info
@ThreadReaderApp @Rattibha @threaddotblue unroll
@reSeeIt save thread
sealevel.info
@ThreadReaderApp @Rattibha @threaddotblue unroll
@reSeeIt save thread
Loading suggestions...