I read the UN document that initiated the mass migration policies to Europe.
The UN document from the year 2000 outlines the need to import an "extraordinarily large" number of migrants by 2050 - up to 701 million.
un.org
The UN document from the year 2000 outlines the need to import an "extraordinarily large" number of migrants by 2050 - up to 701 million.
un.org
The UN's defines the Potential Support Ratio (PSR), which measures how many workers support each retiree. If it plunges to 2 from 4, pension systems collapse. The 'solution'? Flood Europe with migrants in numbers they acknowledge that are unprecedented in history
In order to keep the PSR at the same ratio it was in 1995, the authors explain 701 million migrants need to be imported to the EU by 2050, an average of 12.7m a year
If you include countries outside the EU but in Europe, 1.3 billion migrants are needed. Picking out some of the major countries, it states that the migrants needed for each country are:
France - 89.6 million
Germany - 181.5 million
Italy - 113.4 million
UK - 59 million
France - 89.6 million
Germany - 181.5 million
Italy - 113.4 million
UK - 59 million
By 2050, the authors state in that scenario 75% of people in Europe would be migrants or their descendents. They later speculate it could actually be up to 99%.
The authors conclude that the "only" options for keeping pensions solvent is "international migration", with increases in fertility rate "unlikely to counter population decline"
They acknowledge this will cause societal breakdown, but the pensions must be saved, at any cost.
"Regulating the level of replacement migration streams to reach a desired population size or population age structure poses enormous challenges for Governments"
"Regulating the level of replacement migration streams to reach a desired population size or population age structure poses enormous challenges for Governments"
They bemoan that maintaining the PSR at current levels is likely impossible, even with policies to import as many migrants to Europe as possible
Now, onto the UN report's assumptions (remember, this was published in 2000).
They assume that about 52% of migrants to Europe will be women. We're 24 years into this plan and recent figures show 71% of migrants to the EU are male.
They assume that about 52% of migrants to Europe will be women. We're 24 years into this plan and recent figures show 71% of migrants to the EU are male.
They assume the fertility rate of migrants will fall to the level of the average fertility rate. We're 24 years into this plan and Muslim migrants to Europe have a fertility rate 47% bigger than the national average
They assume migrants will come in and immediately knuckle down to do what they are here to do - fund the pensions (the total number of migrants in and added to the labour force is the same number). We're 24 years in, and just 1 in 5 UK Muslim immigrants have a job.
There was no mention in the report of crime, grooming gangs, terrorism, intimidation, anti-semitism etc that has come with the mass migration policies to Europe.
So there you have it. We're 24 years into the plan. How do you think it is going?
So there you have it. We're 24 years into the plan. How do you think it is going?
Loading suggestions...