If you want my full analysis on Kursk, check out my latest piece for @InsiderEng. It was submitted a week ago, so it predates the latest news. This thread will focus on the key grand strategic outcomes; no tactical or operational analysis here.
2/22
theins.press
2/22
theins.press
No argument that Ukraine has made, no action they have taken β striking Russian energy infrastructure, an early ballistic missile warning radar, and other strategic targets β has been able to convince the Biden Admin that Russia will not escalate. What else could they do?
9/22
9/22
The next day, the Pentagon bizarrely claimed that: βIt is consistent with our policy and we have supported Ukraine from the very beginning to defend themselves against attacks that are coming across the border.β
This is of course not true, as that policy dates to June.
12/22
This is of course not true, as that policy dates to June.
12/22
The policy never permitted Ukraine to use American weapons to launch large-scale ground operations into Russia. Attacking a quiet section of the border in Kursk violates the conditions that Ukraine can only return fire or target imminent threats.
13/22
13/22
Loading suggestions...