By focusing on the supply side (competitors spending less) rather than the demand side (customers spending more), we can gain an edge when investing.
The core framework is that companies in industries with a benign supply side can maintain higher profitability for longer.
The core framework is that companies in industries with a benign supply side can maintain higher profitability for longer.
There are 4 main takeaways that can help improve our investing:
1. Companies with strong moats can maintain profitability for longer than the market expects
Some companies have such strong competitive advantages that they can prevent supply from entering the market. This allows them to maintain profits (e.g. through pricing power)
Some companies have such strong competitive advantages that they can prevent supply from entering the market. This allows them to maintain profits (e.g. through pricing power)
Pricing power can come from concentrated market structure and/or intrinsic pricing power. This could be cases where the cost is a small portion of the total bill, when switching costs are high, technology leadership, etc. Eg. $TDG
3. Cyclical companies look cheap at the top and expensive at the bottom
US homebuilders grew their assets rapidly leading up to home prices peaking in 2006. Investors who bought near the end of the cycle when they were trading around book value ended up with significant losses.
US homebuilders grew their assets rapidly leading up to home prices peaking in 2006. Investors who bought near the end of the cycle when they were trading around book value ended up with significant losses.
Counterintuitively, the best time to buy cyclicals may be when they are trading at a high P/E multiple on depressed earnings at the bottom of a cycle.
4. Strong management allocates capital in a counter-cyclical manner
Buffett once said: "After ten years on the job, a CEO whose company retains 10% of earnings will have been responsible for the deployment of more than 60% of all capital at work in the business"
Buffett once said: "After ten years on the job, a CEO whose company retains 10% of earnings will have been responsible for the deployment of more than 60% of all capital at work in the business"
Managers frequently confuse a benign cycle with skill and overinvest, especially as they feel pressure not to lose market share.
Similarly in investing, everyone looks like a genius in a bull market, but that may just be due to excessive risk-taking rather than true skill.
Similarly in investing, everyone looks like a genius in a bull market, but that may just be due to excessive risk-taking rather than true skill.
Good management allocates capital in a counter-cyclical manner and is properly incentivized.
They are dispassionate about selling assets when someone is willing to overpay in a bull market, and are prepared to acquire from distressed sellers in a recession.
They are dispassionate about selling assets when someone is willing to overpay in a bull market, and are prepared to acquire from distressed sellers in a recession.
TLDR:
1. Companies with strong moats can maintain profitability for longer than expected
2. Firms with lower asset growth outperform
3. Cyclical companies look cheap at the top and expensive at the bottom
4. Strong management allocates capital in a counter-cyclical manner
1. Companies with strong moats can maintain profitability for longer than expected
2. Firms with lower asset growth outperform
3. Cyclical companies look cheap at the top and expensive at the bottom
4. Strong management allocates capital in a counter-cyclical manner
Loading suggestions...