Ground Zero:
56.5079842, 31.6971997
Using warehouse length of 51 meters,
I still stick to the initial estimates of 11kT.
Fireball radius of 180 meters when detonated at a height of 130 meters. Damage profile consistent with moving fireball (at cruise missile speed).
56.5079842, 31.6971997
Using warehouse length of 51 meters,
I still stick to the initial estimates of 11kT.
Fireball radius of 180 meters when detonated at a height of 130 meters. Damage profile consistent with moving fireball (at cruise missile speed).
Heavy blast damage matches at 550 meters.
One last thing. From the orientation of the ellipse, we know what the orientation of the missile was.
If there was no programmed flight change, it came from either Estonia or Latvia, a distance of 300-400km.
If there was no programmed flight change, it came from either Estonia or Latvia, a distance of 300-400km.
P.S. To give you an idea of how much damage this type of blast can do, here is North Sydney, a business district in my city.
This blast would have completely flattened every single building in this area.
This was NOT a small explosion.
This blast would have completely flattened every single building in this area.
This was NOT a small explosion.
P.P.S Just to absolutely beat this dead horse, let us presume this warehouse was stacked to the top with TNT.
It's 50 meters long and 17 meters wide. A forklift should be able to stack about 1 meters packages.
This would leave no room to move around in but humour me.
It's 50 meters long and 17 meters wide. A forklift should be able to stack about 1 meters packages.
This would leave no room to move around in but humour me.
The density of TNT is 1.65 tonnes per cubic metres.
50*17*1*1.65=1.4 kiloton from this house.
Now it's IMPOSSIBLE for this to blow up simultaneously unless arranged in a sphere and with a special timing circuit for reasons explained here:
x.com
50*17*1*1.65=1.4 kiloton from this house.
Now it's IMPOSSIBLE for this to blow up simultaneously unless arranged in a sphere and with a special timing circuit for reasons explained here:
x.com
So this warehouse should not have exploded radially nor should it have had this kind of blast radius and shockwave, nor should it have produced a gunshot sound, nor should it have produced an illuminated Rayleigh-Taylor mushroom cloud.
What are we forced to conclude?
What are we forced to conclude?
1. NATO hit Russia, likely from Estonia or Latvia.
2. From the forward path of the fireball, NATO likely used a stealth tactical nuclear cruise missile, likely the AGM-158 JASSM.
3. NATO has developed clean nuclear warheads, also known as minimised residual radiation (MRR) nukes.
2. From the forward path of the fireball, NATO likely used a stealth tactical nuclear cruise missile, likely the AGM-158 JASSM.
3. NATO has developed clean nuclear warheads, also known as minimised residual radiation (MRR) nukes.
Loading suggestions...