📌 Total Destruction of False Propaganda Against Dharmaveer Chhatrapati Shambhuji Maharaja !
Feel free to quote this post to shut the mouths of those pathetic Anti-Marathas.
Thread 🧵— x.com
Feel free to quote this post to shut the mouths of those pathetic Anti-Marathas.
Thread 🧵— x.com
You must have heard rumors and so-called contemporary sources that tell us that Chhatrapati Shambhuji Maharaja violated a Brahmin girl, or that he was a drunkard and womanizer. x.com
But if you are intelligent enough, then you will also understand how a supposedly characterless man like him could sacrifice his life for Dharma? x.com
Well, this thread is meant for those with high IQs and curious minds, who prefer to think critically rather than believing in the nonsense spread by Anti-Maratha individuals. x.com
In 1676, fake claims circulated that a nameless Brahmin Minister's Daughter was "debauched" by Dharamveer Chattrapati Sambhaji Maharaja.
Later it's clearly said she was Annaji Datto's.
Records of Surnavis Annaji Datto's family PROVE he NEVER had any daughter. x.com
Later it's clearly said she was Annaji Datto's.
Records of Surnavis Annaji Datto's family PROVE he NEVER had any daughter. x.com
NOW WHAT WAS THIS REPORT?
In short, false news was spread in early 1676 that Prince Sambhaji had "Debouched" a Brahmin girl. After his father, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, caught him, Yuvaraj Sambhaji killed him by poisoning him.
This lie was spread to confuse Maratha Generals. x.com
In short, false news was spread in early 1676 that Prince Sambhaji had "Debouched" a Brahmin girl. After his father, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, caught him, Yuvaraj Sambhaji killed him by poisoning him.
This lie was spread to confuse Maratha Generals. x.com
A lot of Anti-Marathas, specifically Siddi Sambal, encouraged the rumors that Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaja was killed in 1676, in order to disturb Maratha Generals in Konkan out of their positions while awaiting confirmation.
However, all researchers know that this is a lie.
However, all researchers know that this is a lie.
While obviously the 1676 Report's Assassination claim was known to be fake and forgotten, claim of Chattrapati Sambhaji Maharaja violating a Brahmin Minister's daughter still persists!
Even though BOTH of these are from SAME context of SAME False report January 1676.
Even though BOTH of these are from SAME context of SAME False report January 1676.
Though this violates all rules of Logic, lets study the premises separately as well -
1. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaja was killed in 1676.
2. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja debauched a Brahmin girl.
Ignore 1st, but in regards to 2nd, why is a Brahmin girl mentioned specifically?
1. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaja was killed in 1676.
2. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja debauched a Brahmin girl.
Ignore 1st, but in regards to 2nd, why is a Brahmin girl mentioned specifically?
Such specificities often imply there is more to a matter than casual hearsay.
So why is "Brahmin Minister's daughter" specifically mentioned?
Because apart from Outcastes, ONLY community's womenfolk taboo to Kshatriyas, are Brahmin. Only such intercourse dynamics are scandalous.
So why is "Brahmin Minister's daughter" specifically mentioned?
Because apart from Outcastes, ONLY community's womenfolk taboo to Kshatriyas, are Brahmin. Only such intercourse dynamics are scandalous.
The person who spread this false rumour was very thorough.
There were no sub-alterns in top echelons of Bhonsale Chhatrapati State.
Anyways read this clearly, the terms are used in archaic sense.
Debauched here does not mean violated in any way, it means corrupted (seduced). x.com
There were no sub-alterns in top echelons of Bhonsale Chhatrapati State.
Anyways read this clearly, the terms are used in archaic sense.
Debauched here does not mean violated in any way, it means corrupted (seduced). x.com
Report is about a claim of a long-drawn AFFAIR and NOT any non-consensual violation.
First everyone should get this clear.
This report itself claims it was a regular intercourse ("going out at *nights*").
So NOT a single scandalous violation, like Anti-Marathas are spreading! x.com
First everyone should get this clear.
This report itself claims it was a regular intercourse ("going out at *nights*").
So NOT a single scandalous violation, like Anti-Marathas are spreading! x.com
In confirmation, it is clear that this (fake) record is about a consensual ROMANCE which is classified as "debauched" due to caste taboos ONLY.
This is a twisted repeat of North Indian Akbar-Salim-Anarkali myth in Deccan's context.
Anyways lets refocus the thread quickly.
This is a twisted repeat of North Indian Akbar-Salim-Anarkali myth in Deccan's context.
Anyways lets refocus the thread quickly.
This entire 1676 report shows the Rumour was intelligently designed.
This intelligence itself proves it is carefully crafted propaganda.
But why was the Assassination forgotten and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja defamed still? x.com
This intelligence itself proves it is carefully crafted propaganda.
But why was the Assassination forgotten and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja defamed still? x.com
Scholar Dr. Manjushri Pawar records the filthy systemic Defamation of Dharamveer Chhatrapati Sambhaji Bhonsale Maharaja in Marathi Academia and Media.
There was a nexus using 1800s Sources without ANY study. Dramas, Articles, Novels!
1850-1950 was a Dark Age for Maharashtra. x.com
There was a nexus using 1800s Sources without ANY study. Dramas, Articles, Novels!
1850-1950 was a Dark Age for Maharashtra. x.com
Now this same Anti-Maratha Lobby works to defame the Shirke Clan to destroy any of their social capital with regards to political aspirations.
Songs with millions of views, videos with millions of views, Quora answers, Twitter threads, Facebook and Instagram Posts, all excreting x.com
Songs with millions of views, videos with millions of views, Quora answers, Twitter threads, Facebook and Instagram Posts, all excreting x.com
Never trust anyone in the ugly media, everyone is treacherous, ungrateful and only waiting for that single vaccum of ignorance.
They saw their defamation of Dharamveer Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja getting eroded by grace of Mahakaal, so they prey on Shirkes now.
Remember this. x.com
They saw their defamation of Dharamveer Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaja getting eroded by grace of Mahakaal, so they prey on Shirkes now.
Remember this. x.com
Regarding history following Sources defame Dharamveer Chattrapati Sambhaji Maharaja
CONTEMPORARY -
• British Report of 1676 January.
This is oldest source, a fake assassination claim from Raigad, spread by Siddi Sambal.
This is ORIGINAL lie which was circulated everywhere. x.com
CONTEMPORARY -
• British Report of 1676 January.
This is oldest source, a fake assassination claim from Raigad, spread by Siddi Sambal.
This is ORIGINAL lie which was circulated everywhere. x.com
Loading suggestions...