Counter Thread 🧵
To the Incident of the Raid / Door
Which even the wildest interpretation of the narration in Musanaf Ibn Abi Shaybah doesn't even hint of
To the Incident of the Raid / Door
Which even the wildest interpretation of the narration in Musanaf Ibn Abi Shaybah doesn't even hint of
The translator of Al Amali translated دخل عليها as "Called upon her"
Instead of putting brackets (Abdur Rehman bin Awf entered the presence of the wife of the Prophet ﷺ without her permission)
Instead of putting brackets (Abdur Rehman bin Awf entered the presence of the wife of the Prophet ﷺ without her permission)
Here also دخل علي
Won't be understood as the Prophet ﷺ entering the presence of the Bedouin or of the sick ppl without their permission
He wd hv, just as its not mentioned in every hadith of the Prophet ﷺ or the sahaba praying that they did Wudu before
Won't be understood as the Prophet ﷺ entering the presence of the Bedouin or of the sick ppl without their permission
He wd hv, just as its not mentioned in every hadith of the Prophet ﷺ or the sahaba praying that they did Wudu before
Till yet haven't seen anyone claiming it's weak bcz Zaid bin Aslam wasn't present
Someone present during the time of the Prophet ﷺ doesn't mean he's a Sahabi, has met him & narrated from him
This is a mistake by Darussalam in its English translation
Abdullah bin Zaid bin Aslam (Who's a weak narrator) is narrating from his father Zaid bin Aslam
not his grandfather Aslam
Zaid bin Aslam's narration is a Mursal one also
Abdullah bin Zaid bin Aslam (Who's a weak narrator) is narrating from his father Zaid bin Aslam
not his grandfather Aslam
Zaid bin Aslam's narration is a Mursal one also
Aslam is narrating events related to his teacher Umar ra (which involves the Prophet ﷺ)
No event is cited here that he narrated an event directly which has no involvement of his teachers
No event is cited here that he narrated an event directly which has no involvement of his teachers
2 problematic narrators in the chain
Abdur Rehman bin Zaid bin Aslam being Weak
Abdul Munim bin Bashir being a Liar
Abdur Rehman bin Zaid bin Aslam being Weak
Abdul Munim bin Bashir being a Liar
An wrongly explained
This is based on shawahid provided the matn is same
The additional material in the weak hadith wd be discarded like this hadith which has a weak narrator & an additional weak statement that Ali ra is better then them
This is based on shawahid provided the matn is same
The additional material in the weak hadith wd be discarded like this hadith which has a weak narrator & an additional weak statement that Ali ra is better then them
In Marifat Al Sahaba by Abu Nuaim
With a Sahih sanad that Abdullah bin Umar saying that Umar ra bought Aslam during the hajj campaign during 11 AH
With a Sahih sanad that Abdullah bin Umar saying that Umar ra bought Aslam during the hajj campaign during 11 AH
Zuhri's idraaj of 6 months delay
Zuhri being born in 51 AH
Umar ra passed away in 23 AH
Disconnected hence weak
Instead we hv a sahih hadith of Ali ra giving bayah after a delay at most of 2 days
Not even a week's delay
Zuhri being born in 51 AH
Umar ra passed away in 23 AH
Disconnected hence weak
Instead we hv a sahih hadith of Ali ra giving bayah after a delay at most of 2 days
Not even a week's delay
Loading suggestions...