āṅgīrasaśreṣṭha
If Veda is body, Siddhāntāgama is heart that pumps the blood of Paramārtha to it. Bhāradvāja who believes in Mūla-Śaiva-Śiddhānta; Ārṣeyāmnāyābhimānī
View on 𝕏Threads
@Saiva_Siddantam @karthikjana Now, in Uttarakāmika, sakalamūrtis of Śiva (full forms) are divided into Maheśa & Rudra mūrtis. While latter includes Kālasam̐hāra & Gajasam̐hāra, for...
Why do some, under a “śāstriya darśana” pretext, dismiss basic facts such as that the religion of the Vedasam̐hitās was primarily or started off primarily as Aindra? See below: 👇🏾...
@bahutbadadanda Lol, it’s unfair because I think even LKY would find India ungovernable without some drastic changes. That said, I still think there is a lot to learn from him.
In the quoted thread, we saw Sañjaya’s dubious statements & linked it to how devotion to Paśu-Śāstras makes even spiritually advanced persons unreliable speakers. We will see a pas...
@Aprameyah_ @pathaspati A little patronizing; Śaivas have been, by & large, tolerant towards the condescension & appropriation exhibited towards it by others (& I mean a broad rang...
@tamil_shaivam @karthikjana இறுதியில் வாய்க்கும். ஆனால் இவ்வளவு காலத்தில் வாய்க்கும் எனக் கூற இயலாது. ஶிவனாராலோ அனந்தர் முதலியவராலோ தொழிற்படுத்தப்படும் அதிகாரம் நிறைந்த பத முக்தியா...
KB—Traditional thinkers should emulate his manly approach of taking on evidence & “data” as they come, instead of denying mindlessly. 3 examples come to mind as I’ll state in subse...
The Siddhānta explains Kālī as a name denoting the particular function of ŚIva’s śakti in relation to concealing a bound soul’s (Paśu’s) vision. One can clearly see how concealed i...
Śivapurāṇa relates how Gajāsura, Mahiṣāsura’s putra, after being impaled by Śrīkaṇṭharudra’s Triśūla, becomes pure with bhakti & asks for a boon that his hide be accepted by Bhagav...
@tskrishnan @tamil_shaivam @Sesha75 @Bhairavan_ @Karunak82713475 Where did I dodge? Where did I say “prohibit”? I said I have seen variation in practice & mentioned a spectrum of w...
@Ethirajans Ok. I’m unsure how that would imply that Advaita Yatis were Ācāryas for the ruling King. It’s simply a reference to royal patronage. Nothing more, no?
@bygonedesires @ArunSubb Yes, even if a śāstra may subtly hint at higher truths, it would be a Paśuśāstra insofar as it does not reveal the higher tattvas taught by the Siddhānta.