Bhaktirasasagara

Bhaktirasasagara

@Bhaktirassagar

Using this account to share things related to Indian politics, Vaishnavism & Vedanta. वेदे रामायणे चैव पुराणे भारते तथा। आदावन्ते च मध्ये च हरिः सर्वत्र गीयते॥

अन्यत्र Joined Jun 2023
28
Threads
8
views
12.1K
Followers
99.3K
Tweets

Threads

Bhaktirasasagara

@AndrewQuintman It's also quite literally a weapon though, a very famous one too. It's called vajrayudha for a reason. 😂 When Krishna mentions his vibhutis he mentions that he is t...

Bhaktirasasagara

@avzaagzonunaada @aryaman2020 I checked the history and it seems to be Hölderlin2019. Prior to his edit it had only "मासैः (māsaiḥ)." Perhaps his algorithm is faulty. This was also...

Bhaktirasasagara

@Rtam86418021 @assuwatama Depends on if you can read Sanskrit. If you can read Sanskrit, I recommend studying Dvyashrayakavya: https://t.co/Y63GUpn0LG If not, then Pischel's gramma...

Bhaktirasasagara

@y_k_s_3 @gaudiya_surya The Abahattha of the Charyagitis is not the same as Odia, but rather the ancestor of Maithili, Odia, Assamese, Bangla, Sylheti, Magahi, etc. Out of those la...

Bhaktirasasagara

It's a circular argument though. Sharada codex is smaller than other recensions and if Mbh ultimately comes from a smaller text, then the Sharada Codex must be the most conservativ...

Bhaktirasasagara

@avzaagzonunaada @dalaygiz Apart from metrical considerations (like syllable weight, etc.) īyas(un) and iṣṭha(n) are essentially inferior cousins of tara(p) and tama(p) respectivel...

Bhaktirasasagara

@dxrsam_0 @kaeshour Yes. We will get ङीप् by उगितश्च since the vyutpatti is from root भा दीप्तौ (to shine or glitter) with डवतु suffix. Since the final उ (उ falls in the pratyahara...

Bhaktirasasagara

@Ugrashravas @HelpedByIndra @pvaal2 बोभवीतु is यङ्लुगन्त, not यङन्त

Bhaktirasasagara

@holatombola I think they list it that way because it's given in Hemachandra's Deśīnāmamālā alongside six meanings (wonder, marriage, mustard seed, smeared, oily, and oil bottle),...

Bhaktirasasagara

@jogandharayana @avzaagzonunaada @agenetics1 There are agricultural terms like Skt. lāṅgalam (plough, naṅgalaṃ in Pali) which clearly seem to be of Dravidian origin (from ñam-kol,...

Bhaktirasasagara

@neilalexanderw1 @avzaagzonunaada @agenetics1 The shared linguistic features with Kurukh-Malto may not be strong, but alongside the close genetic affinity with Balochis, lack of li...

Bhaktirasasagara

@agenetics1 Not sure if one sound change is convining. Though it is interesting that Malto and Kurukh are mentioned in classical texts, but Brahui is not mentioned. इमौ जनपदौ स्थीत...